SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the responsiveness of the SF 36 health survey questionnaire to changes in health status over time for four common clinical conditions. DESIGN: Postal questionnaires at baseline and after one year's follow up, with two reminders at two week intervals if necessary. SETTING: Clinics and four training general practices in Grampian region in the north east of Scotland. PATIENTS: More than 1,700 patients aged 16 to 86 years with one of four conditions: low back pain, menorrhagia, suspected peptic ulcer, and varicose veins; and a random sample of 900 members of the local general population for comparison. MAIN MEASURES: A transition question measuring change in health and the eight scales of the SF 36 health survey questionnaire; standardised response means (mean change in score for a scale divided by the standard deviation of the change in scores) used to quantify the instrument's responsiveness to changes in perceived health status, and comparison of patient scores at baseline and follow up with those of the general population. RESULTS: The response rate exceeded 75% in a patient population. Changes across the SF 36 questionnaire were associated with self reported changes in health, as measured by the transition question. The questionnaire showed significant improvements in health status for all four clinical conditions, whether in referred or non-referred patients. For patients with suspected peptic ulcer and varicose veins the SF 36 profiles at one year approximate to the general population. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide the first evidence of the responsiveness of the SF 36 questionnaire to changes in perceived health status in a patient population in the United Kingdom.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The SF-36 has confirmed validity and reliability.
“Studies confirmed the SF-36's validity and reliability (44–46).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 196
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- MacKenzie CR, Charlson ME, DiGioia D, Kelley K. Can the sickness impact profile measure change? An example of scale assessment. Journal of Chronic Diseases 1986; 39:429-38.
- Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical method in edcn.dal rerh/.i 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
- Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SI-36 hlalthi urccs manunual and illetprctatiiioi guidc. Boston: Nimrrod Press, 1993.
- Sheldon T. Reliability of SF 36 remains uncertain. 1l3A7 1993;307:125-6.
- Roland MO, Coulter AM. Hospital rcfc7rals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
- Garratt AM, Macdonald LM, Ruta DA, Russell II, Buckingham JK, Krukowski ZH. Towards the measurement of outcome for patients ssith s aricose sells. Quality ini Health Care 1993;2:5-10.
- Authors
- Garratt, A. M., Ruta, D. A., Abdalla, M. I., & Russell, I. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Venue
- Quality in Health Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 186-192
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 0963-8172
- 1475-3901
- PMC
- PMC1055239
- OpenAlex
- W2102289626
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 15.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- SF-36, health-related quality of life, responsiveness, health status change, low back pain, menorrhagia, peptic ulcer, varicose veins, general practice patients, self-reported health, standardized response mean
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Menorrhagia, Middle Aged, Peptic Ulcer, Surveys and Questionnaires, Scotland, Varicose Veins, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Low Back Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review