The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hypnosis as Adjunct Therapy in Conscious Sedation for Plastic Surgery
Abstract
Background and objectives Sedation is often requested during local and regional anesthesia. However, some surgical procedures, such as plastic surgery, require conscious sedation, which may be difficult to achieve. Hypnosis, used routinely to provide conscious sedation in the authors' Department of Plastic Surgery, results in high patient and surgeon satisfaction. The authors conducted a retrospective study to investigate the benefits of hypnosis in supplementing local anesthesia. Methods The study included 337 patients undergoing minor and major plastic surgical procedures under local anesthesia and conscious intravenous sedation. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the sedation technique: intravenous sedation (n = 137) using only midazolam and alfentanil; hypnosis (n = 172), during which patients achieved a hypnotic trance level with age regression; and relaxation (n = 28), comprising patients in whom hypnosis was induced without attaining a trance level. In all three groups, midazolam and alfentanil were titrated to achieve patient immobility, in response to patient complaints, and to maintain hemodynamic stability. Midazolam and alfentanil requirements; intra- and postoperative pain scores; as well as pre-, intra-, and postoperative anxiety score, reported on a 10-cm visual analog scale, were recorded and compared in the three groups. Results Intraoperative anxiety reported by patients in the hypnosis group (0.7 +/- 0.11) and in the relaxation group (2.08…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, meta-analyses [33], narrative reviews [34,35], and randomized clinical studies [36–39] all support the potential clinical utility of hypnosis with surgical patients.”
Citations
Cites
The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain
Price, D. D., McGrath, P. A., Rafii, A., & Buckingham, B. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4 · Cited by 3,921
The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings
BOND, A., & LADER, M. (1974) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1974.tb02285.x · Cited by 1,972
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomised trial
Lang, E. V., Benotsch, E. G., Fick, L. J., Lutgendorf, S., Berbaum, M. L., Berbaum, K. S., Logan, H., & Spiegel, D. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02162-0 · Cited by 513
Montgomery, G. H., Bovbjerg, D. H., Schnur, J. B., David, D., Goldfarb, A., Weltz, C. R., Schechter, C., Graff-Zivin, J., Tatrow, K., Price, D. D., et al. (2007) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djm106 · Cited by 292
The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: a meta-analysis.
Montgomery, G. H., David, D., Winkel, G., Silverstein, J. H., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (2002) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/00000539-200206000-00052 · Cited by 206
Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness
Terhune, D. B., Cleeremans, A., Raz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.002 · Cited by 183
The Efficacy, Safety and Applications of Medical Hypnosis: A Systematic Review of Meta-analyses
Häuser, W., Hagl, M., Schmierer, A., & Hansen, E. (2016) · Deutsches Ärzteblatt international · doi:10.3238/arztebl.2016.0289 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Faymonville, M. E., Fissette, J., Mambourg, P. H., Roediger, L., Joris, J., & Lamy, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Liège (BE)
- Milton H. Erickson Institute, Liège, Belgium
- Venue
- Regional Anesthesia: The Journal of Neural Blockade in Obstetrics, Surgery, & Pain Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-151
- ISSN
- 0146-521X (ISSN-L)
- 2331-4613
- OpenAlex
- W179359056
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Regional Anesthesia The Journal of Neural Blockade in Obstetrics Surgery & Pain Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Keywords
- hypnosis, conscious sedation, plastic surgery, local anesthesia, hypnotic trance, age regression, relaxation, midazolam, alfentanil, intraoperative anxiety, intraoperative pain, sedation requirements, patient satisfaction, surgeon satisfaction, minor surgery, regional anesthesia, hemodynamic stability, postoperative recovery time, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative delirium
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anesthesia, Local, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Male, Midazolam, Pain Measurement, Postoperative Pain, Preanesthetic Medication, Relaxation Therapy, Retrospective Studies, Surgery, Plastic, Alfentanil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review