Cited by 28Spondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisOsteomyelitis and Bone Disorders Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinically relevant patient clusters identified by machine learning from the clinical development programme of secukinumab in psoriatic arthritis

Open access

Abstract

Objectives: Identify distinct clusters of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients based on their baseline articular, entheseal and cutaneous disease manifestations and explore their clinical and therapeutic value. Methods: Pooled baseline data in PsA patients (n=1894) treated with secukinumab across four phase 3 studies (FUTURE 2–5) were analysed to determine phenotypes based on clusters of clinical indicators. Finite mixture models methodology was applied to generate clinical clusters and mean longitudinal responses were compared between secukinumab doses (300 vs 150 mg) across identified clusters and clinical indicators through week 52 using machine learning (ML) techniques. Results: Seven distinct patient clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (very-high (VH) – SWO/TEN (swollen/tender); n=187) was characterised by VH polyarticular burden for both tenderness and swelling of joints, while cluster 2 (H (high) – TEN; n=251) was marked by high polyarticular burden in tender joints and cluster 3 (H – Feet – Dactylitis; n=175) by high burden in joints of feet and dactylitis. For cluster 4 (L (Low) – Nails – Skin; n=209), cluster 5 (L – skin; n=283), cluster 6 (L – Nails; n=294) and cluster 7 (L; n=495) articular burden was low but nail and skin involvement was variable, with cluster 7 marked by mild disease activity across all domains. Greater improvements in the longitudinal responses for enthesitis in cluster 2, enthesitis and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in cluster 4 and PASI in cluster 6 were shown for secukinumab 300 mg compared with 150 mg. Conclusions: PsA clusters identified by ML follow variable response trajectories indicating their potential to predict precise impact on patients’ outcomes. Trial registration numbers: NCT01752634, NCT01989468, NCT02294227, NCT02404350

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001845

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Finite mixture models on patients with psoriatic arthritis identified 7 clinical clusters that show variable response trajectories to different secukinumab dosing.

    “Pournara et al (2021) utilized finite mixture models on patients with psoriatic arthritis to identify 7 clinical clusters that show variable response trajectories to different secukinumab dosing.”

    From Artificial intelligence–enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases (2026) · cites this paper as Pournara et al, 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-1-65 · DOI
  2. Hügle, 2020, Applied machine learning and artificial intelligence in rheumatology, Rheumatol Adv Pract, 4, 10.1093/rap/rkaa005 · DOI
  3. 10.1136/bmj.l886 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1083/jcb.201610026 · DOI
  5. Orange, 2018, Identification of three rheumatoid arthritis disease subtypes by machine learning integration of synovial histologic features and RNA sequencing data, Arthritis Rheumatol, 70, 690, 10.1002/art.40428 · DOI
  6. Seyhan, 2019, Are innovation and new technologies in precision medicine paving a new era in patients centric care?, J Transl Med, 17, 10.1186/s12967-019-1864-9 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61134-5 · DOI
  8. Nash, 2018, Efficacy and safety of secukinumab administration by autoinjector in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (future 3), Arthritis Res Ther, 20, 47, 10.1186/s13075-018-1551-x · DOI
  9. Kivitz, 2019, Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Secukinumab 150 mg with or Without Loading Regimen in Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from the FUTURE 4 Study, Rheumatol Ther, 6, 393, 10.1007/s40744-019-0163-5 · DOI
  10. Mease, 2018, Secukinumab improves active psoriatic arthritis symptoms and inhibits radiographic progression: primary results from the randomised, double-blind, phase III future 5 study, Ann Rheum Dis, 77, annrheumdis-2017-212687, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212687 · DOI
  11. McLachlan G , Peel D . Finite mixture models. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
  12. Hennig, 2013, How to find an appropriate clustering for mixed-type variables with application to socio-economic stratification, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C, 62, 309
  13. McInnes I , Kormaksson M , Pournara E . Clinically Relevant Patient Clusters Identified by Machine Learning Tools in a Large Database from the Secukinumab Psoriatic Arthritis Clinical Development Program [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71 https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinically-relevant-patient-clusters-identified-by-machine-learning-tools-in-a-large-database-from-the-secukinumab-psoriatic-arthritis-clinical-development-program/ · DOI
  14. Schwarz, 1978, Estimating the dimension of a model, Ann Statist, 6, 461, 10.1214/aos/1176344136 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pournara, E., Kormaksson, M., Nash, P., Ritchlin, C. T., Kirkham, B. W., Ligozio, G., Pricop, L., Ogdie, A., Coates, L. C., Schett, G., & McInnes, I. B.
Affiliations
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Advanced Exploratory Analytics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Novartis (United States) (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
McInnes, Iain B
Venue
RMD Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-11
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
e001845
ISSN
2056-5933 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3212131372
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RMD Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Novartis Pharma (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteomyelitis and Bone Disorders Research
Keywords
psoriatic arthritis, secukinumab, clinical phenotype, mixture models, enthesitis, dactylitis, nail psoriasis, skin involvement, disease activity, treatment response, IL-17 inhibition, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Enthesopathy, Humans, Arthritis, Psoriatic, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review