Cited by 1LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsGender, Sexuality, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

O11.4 Trans and gender diverse people’s experiences of sexual health care are associated with sexual health screening uptake

Open access

Abstract

Background Transgender and gender non-binary people have unique sexual health needs and rates of HIV and other sexually transmissible infections that outstrip the general population. Very little is known, however, about their experiences of sexual health care, including how those experiences might affect sexual health screening practices. Methods Using data collected via a national survey of transgender and non-binary people in Australia (n=1,636), responses to four items on sexual health care experiences were summed to create a scale from 0 (gender-sensitive) to 4 (gender-insensitive). Bivariate and multivariate analyses compared scale scores and assessed associations with sexual health screening. Results In total, 50% of trans and non-binary participants were uncomfortable disclosing their gender during sexual health care, 68% reported that intake paperwork did not allow accurate gender descriptions, 74% felt staff made assumptions about their bodies or sex lives, and 40% did not receive sexual health care that was sensitive to their needs. On average, non-binary participants experienced the greatest degree of gender-insensitivity (M=2.3) compared with transgender men (M=1.8) and women (M=1.6, p<0.001). Gender insensitivity was most common in hospitals (M=2.9) followed by general practice clinics (M=2.1) and least common in sexual health clinics (M=1.6) and community-lead sexual health services (M=1.3, p<0.001). Among sexually active participants, 51% had received a sexual health screen in the previous year. After controlling for confounders (age, education, income, monogamy, condom use), transgender and non-binary people with more gender-insensitive experiences of sexual health care were less likely to report a recent sexual health screen (adjusted odds ratio=1.3, 95% confidence interval:1.1–1.5, p<0.001). Conclusion Transgender and, in particular, non-binary people experience gender insensitivity when receiving sexual health care, most notably in hospital settings. This insensitivity is associated with delaying sexual health screens among the sexually active. Educating health providers on gender sensitive sexual health care could improve screening uptake. Disclosure No significant relationships.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.167

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gender-inclusive and trauma-guided health care might increase the number of transgender patients who seek sexual health services, including STI testing, because transgender persons are at high risk for sexual violence.

    “Gender-inclusive and trauma-guided health care might increase the number of transgender patients who seek sexual health services, including STI testing (341), because transgender persons are at high risk for sexual violence (342).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [341]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Callander, D., Cook, T., Cornelisse, V., Pony, M., Duncan, D., Wiggins, J., Vlahakis, E., Duck-Chong, L., Rosenberg, S., & Holt, M.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Oral Presentations
Published
2019-07
Pages
A64.1-A64
OpenAlex
W3009991338
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Oral Presentations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
transgender people, non-binary people, sexual health care, HIV, sexually transmitted infections, gender disclosure, hospital settings, gender-sensitive care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review