P494 Diagnosis and management of Lymphogranuloma Venererum (LGV) in a municipal STD clinic, san francisco, 2016–18
Open accessAbstract
Background Little is known about the prevalence of lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) among men who have sex with men (MSM) with symptomatic rectal chlamydia (CT) in US settings. Methods Clinicians at the San Francisco municipal STD clinic order an LGV PCR when evaluating rectal symptoms on a case by case basis. The LGV PCR is only run if the CT nucleic amplification test (NAAT) is positive. We compared characteristics of MSM found to have LGV with those who were infected with non-LGV CT. Results Rectal LGV testing was ordered at 666 patient-visits during 2016–2018, with 197 visits (29.6%) having a positive CT NAAT (169 individuals), and 94 visits a positive LGV PCR (47.7% of CT NAAT+ visits, 14.1% of all visits). Compared to visits at which the patient was CT+/LGV-, MSM with LGV were significantly (p<0.05) more likely to report rectal discharge (67% vs 40%), bleeding (39% vs 26%), have ≥=10 white blood cells (WBCs) on rectal gram stain (54% vs 29%), or be diagnosed with proctitis (78% vs 63%). At over half (54%) of CT+/LGV- visits there were < 5 WBCs on rectal gram stain, compared with 29% of CT+/LGV+ visits. There was no significant difference in reported number of sex partners, history of gonorrhea or chlamydia in the past year, or PrEP use between CT+/LGV+ and CT+/LGV- visits. MSM at CT+/LGV+ visits were more likely to be ≥ 40 years (42% vs 23%), Hispanic (40% vs 27%), and living with HIV (57% vs 30%). Conclusion Almost 50% of MSM with rectal CT were positive for LGV in this clinic-based sample. In the absence of an LGV test, clinicians should have a low threshold for empiric LGV treatment in MSM with rectal symptoms and a positive rectal CT NAAT. Disclosure No significant relationships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The recommended 21-day course of doxycycline for LGV is based on long-standing clinical practice and is highly effective, with an estimated cure rate of >98.5%.
“The recommended 21-day course of doxycycline is based on long-standing clinical practice and is highly effective, with an estimated cure rate of >98.5% (555,556).”
From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [555]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 2
- Authors
- Cohen, S., Brosnan, H., Kohn, R., Bacon, O., Ooms, T., & Nguyen, T.
- Affiliations
- San Francisco Department of Public Health (US)
- Venue
- Poster Presentations
- Publisher
- BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
- Published
- 2019-07
- Pages
- A229.1-A229
- OpenAlex
- W3021397850
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Poster presentations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
- Keywords
- lymphogranuloma venereum, men who have sex with men, rectal chlamydia, Chlamydia trachomatis, empirical treatment, HIV coinfection, STD clinics, San Francisco
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review