Cited by 2Reproductive tract infections researchSyphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentBacterial Infections and Vaccines

P494 Diagnosis and management of Lymphogranuloma Venererum (LGV) in a municipal STD clinic, san francisco, 2016–18

Open access
Cohen, Stephanie, Brosnan, Hannah, Kohn, Robert, Bacon, Oliver, Ooms, Tamara, Nguyen, Trang·2019·Poster Presentations

Abstract

Background Little is known about the prevalence of lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) among men who have sex with men (MSM) with symptomatic rectal chlamydia (CT) in US settings. Methods Clinicians at the San Francisco municipal STD clinic order an LGV PCR when evaluating rectal symptoms on a case by case basis. The LGV PCR is only run if the CT nucleic amplification test (NAAT) is positive. We compared characteristics of MSM found to have LGV with those who were infected with non-LGV CT. Results Rectal LGV testing was ordered at 666 patient-visits during 2016–2018, with 197 visits (29.6%) having a positive CT NAAT (169 individuals), and 94 visits a positive LGV PCR (47.7% of CT NAAT+ visits, 14.1% of all visits). Compared to visits at which the patient was CT+/LGV-, MSM with LGV were significantly (p<0.05) more likely to report rectal discharge (67% vs 40%), bleeding (39% vs 26%), have ≥=10 white blood cells (WBCs) on rectal gram stain (54% vs 29%), or be diagnosed with proctitis (78% vs 63%). At over half (54%) of CT+/LGV- visits there were < 5 WBCs on rectal gram stain, compared with 29% of CT+/LGV+ visits. There was no significant difference in reported number of sex partners, history of gonorrhea or chlamydia in the past year, or PrEP use between CT+/LGV+ and CT+/LGV- visits. MSM at CT+/LGV+ visits were more likely to be ≥ 40 years (42% vs 23%), Hispanic (40% vs 27%), and living with HIV (57% vs 30%). Conclusion Almost 50% of MSM with rectal CT were positive for LGV in this clinic-based sample. In the absence of an LGV test, clinicians should have a low threshold for empiric LGV treatment in MSM with rectal symptoms and a positive rectal CT NAAT. Disclosure No significant relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.576

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The recommended 21-day course of doxycycline for LGV is based on long-standing clinical practice and is highly effective, with an estimated cure rate of >98.5%.

    “The recommended 21-day course of doxycycline is based on long-standing clinical practice and is highly effective, with an estimated cure rate of >98.5% (555,556).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [555]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 2

Authors
Cohen, S., Brosnan, H., Kohn, R., Bacon, O., Ooms, T., & Nguyen, T.
Affiliations
San Francisco Department of Public Health (US)
Venue
Poster Presentations
Published
2019-07
Pages
A229.1-A229
OpenAlex
W3021397850
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Poster presentations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
lymphogranuloma venereum, men who have sex with men, rectal chlamydia, Chlamydia trachomatis, empirical treatment, HIV coinfection, STD clinics, San Francisco

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review