What happened to smokers’ beliefs about light cigarettes when “light/mild” brand descriptors were banned in the UK? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey
Open accessAbstract
Aim: This paper examines how beliefs of smokers in the UK were affected by the removal of “light” and “mild” brand descriptors, which came into effect on 30 September 2003 for Member States of the European Union (EU). Participants: The data come from the first four waves (2002–2005) of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Four-Country Survey, an annual cohort telephone survey of adult smokers in Canada, USA, UK and Australia (15 450 individual cases). Design: The UK ban on misleading descriptors occurred around the second wave of data collection in the ITC survey, permitting us to compare beliefs about light cigarettes among adult smokers in the UK before and after the ban, with beliefs in the three other ITC countries unaffected by the ban. Results: There was a substantial decline in reported beliefs about the benefits of light cigarettes in the UK following the policy change and an associated public information campaign, but by 2005 (ie, wave 4), these beliefs rebounded slightly and the change in beliefs was no greater than in the USA, where there was no policy change. Conclusions: The findings reveal that high levels of misperceptions about light cigarettes existed among smokers in all four countries before and after the EU ban took effect. We cannot conclude that the policy of removing some aspects of misleading labels has been effective in changing beliefs about light cigarettes. Efforts to correct decades of consumer misperceptions about light cigarettes must extend beyond simply removing “light” and “mild” brand descriptors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PMI's Uruguayan subsidiary Abal responded to the prohibition by colour-coding cigarette packages, for example replacing Marlboro Lights with yellow Marlboro packages.
“Philip Morris International’s (PMI) Uruguayan subsidiary Abal Hermanos (Abal) responded to the prohibition by colour-coding cigarette packages (eg, replacing Marlboro Lights with yellow Marlboro packages).”
From Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay: transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
The single pack presentation permitted only one variant of each cigarette brand, which prohibited the colour-coding of light and mild or menthol variants.
“(The single pack presentation permitted only one variant of each cigarette brand which prohibited the colour-coding of ‘light’ and ‘mild’28–3033 or menthol33 variants).”
From Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay: transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Crosbie, E., Sosa, P., & Glantz, S. A. (2018) · Tobacco control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053690 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- Borland, R., Fong, G. T., Yong, H.-H., Cummings, K. M., Hammond, D., King, B., Siahpush, M., McNeill, A., Hastings, G., O’Connor, R. J., Elton-Marshall, T., & Zanna, M. P.
- Affiliations
- Cancer Council Victoria (AU)
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA)
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- University of Stirling (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Borland, R
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-04-21
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 256-262
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- PMC
- PMC4658347
- OpenAlex
- W2107669981
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK (C312/A3726)
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007489/1)
- National Cancer Institute (P50CA111236, R01CA100362)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- light cigarettes, consumer misperception, tobacco control policy evaluation, information campaigns
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Australia, Canada, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Terminology as Topic, Product Labeling, Smoking, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review