Long-term effectiveness of behavioural interventions to prevent smoking among children and youth
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of recent behavioural interventions in the prevention of cigarette use among children and youth and to compare the effectiveness of different school-based, community-based and multisectorial intervention strategies. Methods: A structured search of databases and a manual search of reference lists was conducted. Randomised controlled trials published in English or German between August 2001 and August 2006 targeting youths up to 18 years of age were assessed independently by two researchers according to predefined inclusion criteria and with regard to methodological quality. Data abstraction was performed and crosschecked by two researchers. Where appropriate, pooled effect estimates were calculated and tested in sensitivity analyses. Results: Of 3555 articles, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. The follow-up duration ranged from 12 months to 120 months. Although the overall effectiveness of prevention programs showed considerable heterogeneity, the majority of studies reported some positive long-term effects for behavioural smoking prevention programs. There was evidence that community-based and multisectorial interventions were effective in reducing smoking rates; in contrast, the evidence for school-based programs alone was inconclusive. Regardless of the type of intervention, the reductions observed in smoking rates were only modest. Conclusions: The present work identified moderate evidence for the effectiveness of behavioural interventions to prevent smoking. Although evidence for the effectiveness of school-based interventions was inconclusive, evidence for the effectiveness of community-based and multisectorial interventions was somewhat stronger. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of specific intervention components and the cost-effectiveness of interventions analysed in methodologically high-quality studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Community-based and multisectoral interventions were effective in reducing smoking rates.
“There was evidence that community-based and multisectoral interventions were effective in reducing smoking rates, while the evidence for school-based programs alone was inconclusive.”
From Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
Evidence for school-based programs alone in reducing smoking rates was inconclusive.
“There was evidence that community-based and multisectoral interventions were effective in reducing smoking rates, while the evidence for school-based programs alone was inconclusive.”
From Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
The majority of studies report some positive long-term effects for behavioral smoking prevention programs.
“Although the overall effectiveness of prevention programs showed considerable heterogeneity, the majority of studies report some positive long-term effects for behavioral smoking prevention programs.”
From Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
Cites
Passive smoking and the risk of coronary heart disease—a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies
He, J., Vupputuri, S., Allen, K., Prerost, M. R., Hughes, J., & Whelton, P. K. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199903253401204 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
A review of 25 long-term adolescent tobacco and other drug use prevention program evaluations
Skara, S., & Sussman, S. (2003) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00166-x · Cited by 310 · see citing works
A systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up
Wiehe, S. E., Garrison, M. M., Christakis, D. A., Ebel, B. E., & Rivara, F. P. (2005) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.12.003 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Das, J. K., Salam, R. A., Arshad, A., Finkelstein, Y., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.021 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Faggiano, F., Vigna-Taglianti, F., Burkhart, G., Bohrn, K., Cuomo, L., Gregori, D., Panella, M., Scatigna, M., Siliquini, R., Varona, L., et al. (2010) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.11.018 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
- Authors
- Müller-Riemenschneider, F., Bockelbrink, A., Reinhold, T., Rasch, A., Greiner, W., & Willich, S. N.
- Affiliations
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-06-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 301-302
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2116701408
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
- Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- smoking prevention, adolescent smoking, behavioral interventions, school-based intervention, community-based intervention, long-term effectiveness, adolescent tobacco use, cost-effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Behavior Therapy, Child, Community Health Services, Health Promotion, Humans, School Health Services, Program Evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review