The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prospective study of the incidence, aetiology and outcome of adult lower respiratory tract illness in the community
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Acute lower respiratory tract illness in previously well adults is usually labelled as acute bronchitis and treated with antibiotics without establishing the aetiology. Viral infection is thought to be the cause in most cases. We have investigated the incidence, aetiology, and outcome of this condition. METHODS: Previously well adults from a stable suburban population consulting over one year with a lower respiratory tract illness were studied. For the first six months detailed investigations identified predetermined direct and indirect markers of infection. Evidence of infection was assessed in relation to presenting clinical features, indirect markers of infection, antibiotic use, and outcome. RESULTS: Consultations were very common, particularly in younger women (70/1000 per year in previously well women aged 16-39 years), mainly in the winter months; 638 patients consulted, of whom 316 were investigated. Pathogens were identified in 173 (55%) cases: bacteria in 82 (Streptococcus pneumoniae 54, Haemophilus influenzae 31, Moraxella catarrhalis 7), atypical organisms in 75 (Chlamydia pneumoniae 55, Mycoplasma pneumoniae 23), and viruses in 61 (influenza 23). Seventy nine (24%) had indirect evidence of infection. Bacterial and atypical infection correlated with changes in the chest radiograph and high levels of C reactive protein but not with (a) the GP's clinical assessment of whether infection was present, (b) clinical features other than focal chest signs, and (c) outcome, whether or not appropriate antibiotics were prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: Over 50% of patients have direct and/or indirect evidence of infection, most commonly bacterial and atypical pathogens, but the outcome is unrelated to the identified pathogens. Many patients improve without antibiotics and investigations do not help in the management of these patients. GPs can reassure patients of the causes and usual outcome of this self-limiting condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hayden, F. G., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., Treanor, J. J., Fleming, D. M., Aoki, F. Y., Nicholson, K. G., Bohnen, A. M., Hirst, H. M., Keene, O., & Wightman, K. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199709253371302 · Cited by 762
Acute Respiratory Illness in an American Community: The Tecumseh Study
Monto, A. S. (1974) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1974.03230150016004 · Cited by 297
Cited by
Laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection
Daxboeck, F., Krause, R., & Wenisch, C. (2003) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00590.x · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Macfarlane, J.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-114
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111566523
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective study of the incidence, aetiology and outcome of adult lower respiratory tract illness in the community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thorax.56.2.109
- The paper
- Macfarlane, J. (2001). Prospective study of the incidence, aetiology and outcome of adult lower respiratory tract illness in the community. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax.56.2.109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.