Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT

Open access
Saghir, Zaigham, Dirksen, Asger, Ashraf, Haseem, Bach, Karen Skjøldstrup, Brodersen, John, Clementsen, Paul Frost, Døssing, Martin, Hansen, Hanne, Kofoed, Klaus Fuglsang, Larsen, Klaus Richter, Mortensen, Jann, Rasmussen, Jakob Fraes, Seersholm, Niels, Skov, Birgit Guldhammer, Thorsen, Hanne, Tønnesen, Philip, Pedersen, Jesper Holst·2012·Thorax

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects of low-dose CT screening on disease stage shift, mortality and overdiagnosis are unclear. Lung cancer findings and mortality rates are reported at the end of screening in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial. METHODS: 4104 men and women, healthy heavy smokers/former smokers were randomised to five annual low-dose CT screenings or no screening. Two experienced chest radiologists read all CT scans and registered the location, size and morphology of nodules. Nodules between 5 and 15 mm without benign characteristics were rescanned after 3 months. Growing nodules (>25% volume increase and/or volume doubling time<400 days) and nodules >15 mm were referred for diagnostic workup. In the control group, lung cancers were diagnosed and treated outside the study by the usual clinical practice. RESULTS: Participation rates were high in both groups (screening: 95.5%; control: 93.0%; p<0.001). Lung cancer detection rate was 0.83% at baseline and mean annual detection rate was 0.67% at incidence rounds (p=0.535). More lung cancers were diagnosed in the screening group (69 vs. 24, p<0.001), and more were low stage (48 vs 21 stage I-IIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and limited stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC), p=0.002), whereas frequencies of high-stage lung cancer were the same (21 vs 16 stage IIIA-IV NSCLC and extensive stage SCLC, p=0.509). At the end of screening, 61 patients died in the screening group and 42 in the control group (p=0.059). 15 and 11 died of lung cancer, respectively (p=0.428). CONCLUSION: CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease, and at this point no stage shift or reduction in mortality was observed. More lung cancers were diagnosed in the screening group, indicating some degree of overdiagnosis and need for longer follow-up.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200736

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 390

Metadata

Authors
Saghir, Z., Dirksen, A., Ashraf, H., Bach, K. S., Brodersen, J., Clementsen, P. F., Døssing, M., Hansen, H., Kofoed, K. F., Larsen, K. R., Mortensen, J., Rasmussen, J. F., Seersholm, N., Skov, B. G., Thorsen, H., Tønnesen, P., & Pedersen, J. H.
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-01-27
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
296-301
ISSN
  • 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3296
OpenAlex
W2143428001
Cited by
390
References
3
FWCI
37.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200736
The paper
Saghir, Z., Dirksen, A., Ashraf, H., Bach, K. S., Brodersen, J., Clementsen, P. F., Døssing, M., Hansen, H., Kofoed, K. F., Larsen, K. R., Mortensen, J., Rasmussen, J. F., Seersholm, N., Skov, B. G., Thorsen, H., Tønnesen, P., & Pedersen, J. H. (2012). CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200736

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.