Cited by 1Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

P203 Correlation of Nijmegen score and hospital anxiety/depression (HAD) score in dysfunctional breathlessness

Open access
Dwarakanath, A., Davison, V., Taylor, C. M., Fennerty, A. G.·2011·Thorax

Abstract

Introduction Dysfunctional Breathlessness has an incidence of about 10% among the general population and can often coexist with other chronic cardio respiratory illness. Patients often have a degree of anxiety or depression and may pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Nijmegen questionnaire is suitable as a screening tool for early detection and also as an aid in diagnosis and therapy planning. Aim To test the correlation between the Nijmegen score and the hospital anxiety/depression score in patients diagnosed with dysfunctional breathlessness. Method The diagnosis was made on the basis of exclusion with a normal clinical examination, lung function and echocardiogram, or with symptoms disproportionate to measurements of severity of their respiratory illness. The physiotherapist further assessed patients with particular regard to their breathing pattern and the Nijmegen (Ni) score, with a score over 23 being regarded as diagnostic. Consecutive patients referred to the clinic over 24 months were reviewed. The following parameters were analysed- demographics, underlying respiratory illness, breathing and sleep pattern, Nijmegen score (Pre and Post Intervention), HAD scores and the interventional modalities. Results 51 patients (males 20, females 31) were assessed. The mean age at presentation was 60.2 (range 20–84). 26/51 patients had chronic cardio respiratory illness. 28/51 patients had an abnormal breathing pattern, the most common being frequent sighing. 23/51 patients reported abnormal sleep pattern, frequent awakening being the commonest. 37 patients (males 17, females 20) had a pre intervention Ni score over 23 (mean 29, range 23–42). Interventions included patient education, cognitive–behavioural therapy, breathing exercises and training in a physiotherapist led clinic. The interventional period was 6 weeks and post 6 weeks the Nijmegen score fell below the diagnostic threshold in 29/37 patients (mean reduction 14, range 3–22, p value<0.001). HAD scores was used to assess the degree of mood impairment and there was no linear correlation (Pearson correlation) (Abstract P203 table 1) with the pre intervention Nijmegen score. Conclusion There was no correlation between the Nijmegen score and the hospital anxiety/depression score in patients with dysfunctional breathlessness. A physiotherapy led dysfunctional breathlessness clinic was able to improve symptoms in 78% of the referred cases as measured by Ni score.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201054c.203

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another small study showed similar improvement over 24 months in both the Nijmegen questionnaire and HADS, but no correlation between the two scores.

    “Another small study showed a similar improvement over 24 months in both the Nijmegen questionnaire and HADS, but no correlation between the two scores [38].”

    From Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification (2016) · cites this paper as [38]

    The P203 abstract (Thorax supplement, p. A149) reports no correlation between pre-intervention Nijmegen and HAD scores, and a reduction in Nijmegen scores after a six-week intervention. It does not report improvement in HAD scores. Its 24-month period describes patient referrals, not follow-up or improvement over 24 months. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hunter CJ, Brightling CE, Woltmann G, et al. A comparison of the validity of different diagnostic tests in adults with asthma. Chest 2002; 121:1051e7.
  2. Sverrild A, Porsbjerg C, Thomsen SF, et al. Diagnostic properties of inhaled mannitol in the diagnosis of asthma: a population study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 124:928e32.e1.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dwarakanath, A., Davison, V., Taylor, C. M., & Fennerty, A. G.
Affiliations
Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
66
Issue
Suppl 4
Pages
A149-A150
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2335601196
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2016: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Nijmegen questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, anxiety, depression, physiotherapy, breathing pattern, sleep disorders, cognitive behavioral therapy, patient education, breathing exercises, screening tool, treatment outcomes, sighing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review