The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting tuberculous pleurisy: pleural fluid characteristics and diagnostic yield of mycobacterial culture in an endemic area
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculous pleurisy is traditionally indicated by extreme lymphocytosis in pleural fluid and low yield of effusion culture. However, there is considerable inconsistency among previous study results. In addition, these data should be updated due to early effusion studies and advances in culture methods. METHODS: From January 2004 to June 2009, patients with tuberculous pleurisy were retrospectively identified from the mycobacteriology laboratories and the pathology and tuberculosis registration databases of two hospitals in Taiwan where tuberculosis is endemic. Pleural fluid characteristics and yields of mycobacterial cultures using liquid media were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 382 patients with tuberculous pleurisy were identified. The median lymphocyte percentage of total cells in pleural fluids was 84% (IQR 64-95%) and 17% of cases had a lymphocyte percentage of <50%. The lymphocyte percentage was negatively associated with the probability of a positive effusion culture (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.96 to 0.99). The diagnostic yields were 63% for effusion culture, 48% for sputum culture, 79% for the combination of effusion and sputum cultures, and 74% for histological examination of pleural biopsy specimens. CONCLUSION: The degree of lymphocyte predominance in tuberculous pleurisy was lower than was previously thought. The lymphocyte percentage in pleural fluid was negatively associated with the probability of a positive effusion culture. With the implementation of a liquid culture method, the sensitivity of effusion culture was much higher than has been previously reported, and the combination of effusion and sputum cultures provided a good diagnostic yield.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Epidemiology of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis in the United States, 1993–2006
Peto, H. M., Pratt, R. H., Harrington, T. A., LoBue, P. A., & Armstrong, L. R. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/605559 · Cited by 741
Porcel, J. M. (2009) · Lung · doi:10.1007/s00408-009-9165-3 · Cited by 303
Yield of sputum induction in the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis
Conde, M. B., Loivos, A. C., Rezende, V. M., Soares, S. L. M., Mello, F. C. Q., Reingold, A. L., Daley, C. L., & Kritski, A. L. (2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.2111019 · Cited by 204
Cited by
Diagnosis and Treatment of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis
Lee, J. Y. (2015) · Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases · doi:10.4046/trd.2015.78.2.47 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruan, S.-Y., Chuang, Y.-C., Wang, J.-Y., Lin, J.-W., Chien, J.-Y., Huang, C.-T., Kuo, Y.-W., Lee, L.-N., & Yu, C.-J. J.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-03-21
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 822-827
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3296
- OpenAlex
- W2166545665
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting tuberculous pleurisy: pleural fluid characteristics and diagnostic yield of mycobacterial culture in an endemic area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201363
- The paper
- Ruan, S.-Y., Chuang, Y.-C., Wang, J.-Y., Lin, J.-W., Chien, J.-Y., Huang, C.-T., Kuo, Y.-W., Lee, L.-N., & Yu, C.-J. J. (2012). Revisiting tuberculous pleurisy: pleural fluid characteristics and diagnostic yield of mycobacterial culture in an endemic area. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.