The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What's hot that the other lot got
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“uniquely, it is the only tribal state that addresses the use of border zones (establishing different tax rates for tribal retailers located near Kansas or Missouri).23”
From Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015 (2016) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Jong, 2015, Idiosyncratic reactions are the most common cause of abnormal liver function tests in patients with cystic fibrosis, Intern Med J, 45, 395, 10.1111/imj.12707 · DOI
- Ozge, 2015, The impact of hypoxemia on serum total and free prostate-specific antigen levels in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Med Oncol, 32, 156, 10.1007/s12032-015-0602-2 · DOI
- Berthon, 2015, Effects of short-term oral corticosteroid intake on dietary intake, body weight and body composition in adults with asthma – a randomized controlled trial, Clin Exp Allergy, 45, 908, 10.1111/cea.12505 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015
DeLong, H., Chriqui, J., Leider, J., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2016) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053079 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Soar, B.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2015-06-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 710-710
- ISSN
- 0040-6376
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What's hot that the other lot got. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207285
- The paper
- Soar, B. (2015). What's hot that the other lot got. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207285
