Cluster-randomised trial of a nurse-led advance care planning session in patients with COPD and their loved ones
Open accessAbstract
Rationale: Advance care planning (ACP) is uncommon in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objectives: To assess whether a nurse-led ACP-intervention can improve quality of patient-physician end-of-life care communication in patients with COPD. Furthermore, the influence of an ACP-intervention on symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients and loved ones was studied. Finally, quality of death and dying was assessed in patients who died during 2-year follow-up. Methods: A multicentre cluster randomised-controlled trial in patients with advanced COPD was performed. The intervention group received an 1.5 hours structured nurse-led ACP-session. Outcomes were: quality of patient-physician end-of-life care communication, prevalence of ACP-discussions 6 months after baseline, symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients and loved ones and quality of death and dying. Results: 165 patients were enrolled (89 intervention; 76 control). The improvement of quality of patient-physician end-of-life care communication was significantly higher in the intervention group compared with the control group (p<0.001). The ACP-intervention was significantly associated with the occurrence of an ACP-discussion with physicians within 6 months (p=0.003). At follow-up, symptoms of anxiety were significantly lower in loved ones in the intervention group compared with the control group (p=0.02). Symptoms of anxiety in patients and symptoms of depression in both patients and loved ones were comparable at follow-up (p>0.05). The quality of death and dying was comparable between both groups (p=0.17). Conclusion: One nurse-led ACP-intervention session improves patient-physician end-of-life care communication without causing psychosocial distress in both patients and loved ones.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some background evidence suggests that discrepant interpretations of DNACPR discussion occur with a concerning frequency between physicians and their hospitalised patients.
“Some of the background evidence suggests that discrepant interpretations of DNACPR discussion occur with a concerning frequency between physicians and their hospitalised patients. 276”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [276]
Cites
Rietjens, J. A. C., Sudore, R. L., Connolly, M., van Delden, J. J., Drickamer, M. A., Droger, M., van der Heide, A., Heyland, D. K., Houttekier, D., Janssen, D. J. A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30582-x · Cited by 1,371 · see citing works
Self-citationA systematic review of reasons for gatekeeping in palliative care research
Kars, M. C., van Thiel, G. J., van der Graaf, R., Moors, M., de Graeff, A., & van Delden, J. J. (2016) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216315616759 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Walkup, J. T., Barlow, A., Mullany, B. C., Pan, W., Goklish, N., Hasting, R., Cowboy, B., Fields, P., Baker, E. V., Speakman, K., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e3181a0ab86 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McMahan, R. D., Tellez, I., & Sudore, R. L. (2021) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.16801 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions
Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Couper, K., Voorde, P. V. D., Druwé, P., Blom, M., Perkins, G. D., Lulic, I., Djakow, J., Raffay, V., Lilja, G., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.017 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
“information of the primary physician all improved the consensus about care between patients, their families and the healthcare professionals.(37,265,267,280)”
Background
- Authors
- Houben, C. H. M., Spruit, M. A., Luyten, H., Pennings, H.-J., van den Boogaart, V. E. M., Creemers, J. P. H. M., Wesseling, G., Wouters, E. F. M., & Janssen, D. J. A.
- Affiliations
- Ciro (NL)
- Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
- University of Twente (NL)
- Laurentius Ziekenhuis (NL)
- Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Houben, Carmen H M
- ORCID
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-01-19
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 328-336
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3296
- OpenAlex
- W2910595524
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Thorax (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Lung Foundation Netherlands
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Keywords
- advance care planning, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nurse-led intervention, patient-physician communication, anxiety, depression, family caregivers, psychosocial distress
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Anxiety, Death, Depression, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Physician-Patient Relations, Quality of Health Care, Terminal Care, Cluster Analysis, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Advance Care Planning, Health Communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review