The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Asthma exacerbations during pregnancy: incidence and association with adverse pregnancy outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Exacerbations of asthma during pregnancy represent a significant clinical problem and may be related to poor pregnancy outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was conducted for publications related to exacerbations during pregnancy. Four studies with a control group (no asthma) and two groups of women with asthma (exacerbation, no exacerbation) were included in meta-analyses using fixed effects models. During pregnancy, exacerbations of asthma which require medical intervention occur in about 20% of women, with approximately 6% of women being admitted to hospital. Exacerbations during pregnancy occur primarily in the late second trimester; the major triggers are viral infection and non-adherence to inhaled corticosteroid medication. Women who have a severe exacerbation during pregnancy are at a significantly increased risk of having a low birth weight baby compared with women without asthma. No significant associations between exacerbations during pregnancy and preterm delivery or pre-eclampsia were identified. Inhaled corticosteroid use may reduce the risk of exacerbations during pregnancy. Pregnant women may be less likely to receive oral steroids for the emergency management of asthma. The effective management and prevention of asthma exacerbations during pregnancy is important for the health of both the mother and fetus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Cited by
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Song, F., Parekh, Hooper, L., Loke, Y., Ryder, J., Sutton, A., Hing, C., Kwok, C., Pang, C., & Harvey, I. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14080 · Cited by 1,039
It's all about sex: gender, lung development and lung disease
Carey, M. A., Card, J. W., Voltz, J. W., Arbes, S. J., Germolec, D. R., Korach, K. S., & Zeldin, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2007.08.003 · Cited by 417
Powell, H., Murphy, V. E., Taylor, D. R., Hensley, M. J., McCaffery, K., Giles, W., Clifton, V. L., & Gibson, P. G. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60971-9 · Cited by 339
Self-citationThe role of sex in the genomics of human complex traits
Khramtsova, E. A., Davis, L. K., & Stranger, B. E. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0083-1 · Cited by 303
Davis, E. P., & Pfaff, D. (2014) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.06.014 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, V. E.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-176
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996979403
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asthma exacerbations during pregnancy: incidence and association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thx.2005.049718
- The paper
- Murphy, V. E. (2006). Asthma exacerbations during pregnancy: incidence and association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2005.049718
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.