Development and validity testing of an IPF-specific version of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire
Open accessAbstract
RATIONALE: The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is often applied to assess health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Some SGRQ items will inevitably have weaker measurement properties than others when applied to this population. This study was conducted to develop an IPF-specific version of the SGRQ. METHODS: Data from a recently completed trial that enrolled subjects with IPF (n=158) who completed the SGRQ and other measures were analysed at baseline and 6 months. There were four phases to the study: (1) removing items with missing responses and using Rasch analysis on retained items to identify fit and refine item response categories; (2) development of a new scoring scheme; (3) testing agreement between original and revised versions and testing construct validity of the revised SGRQ; and (4) rewording to finalise the IPF-specific version (SGRQ-I). RESULTS: Items were removed due to missing responses (6 items) and misfit to the Rasch model (10 items); 34 items from the original 50 were retained. For certain items, disordered response thresholds were identified and corrected by collapsing response categories. A scoring algorithm was developed to place SGRQ-I scores on a scale with SGRQ scores. For any given outcome measure (eg, forced vital capacity (% predicted) and lung carbon monoxide transfer factor (% predicted), 6-min walk distance and patient-reported questionnaires), Pearson correlations were similar between pairs that included original SGRQ scores and corresponding pairs that included SGRQ-I scores. Internal reliability (Cronbach α) for each SGRQ-I component was comparable to the original SGRQ (Symptoms 0.62; Activities 0.80; Impacts 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The SGRQ-I contains items from the original SGRQ that are the most reliable for measuring health-related quality of life in patients with IPF.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Breathlessness is multidimensional, composed of at least a physical sensation and an emotional reaction.
“Breathlessness is multidimensional composed of at least a physical sensation and emotional reaction [22].”
From A randomised controlled feasibility trial of Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for people with severe asthma (2017) · cites this paper as [22]
Methods > Outcome measures describes breathlessness across three dimensions in the Baseline Dyspnoea Index. Methods > Study phases and statistical analyses also distinguishes activities limited by breathlessness from the disease’s impact on emotional health. Neither passage says breathlessness itself comprises a physical sensation and an emotional reaction; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 147
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [18]ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002 166 111 17 12091180
- Authors
- Yorke, J., Jones, P. W., & Swigris, J. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Salford (GB)
- National Jewish Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Swigris, J. J.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2010-09-22
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 921-926
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3697105
- OpenAlex
- W2114703873
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Thorax (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL092227)
- Actelion Pharmaceuticals
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, health-related quality of life, patient-reported outcome measures, Rasch analysis, scoring algorithm, construct validity, internal consistency
- MeSH terms
- Bosentan, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Sulfonamides, Vital Capacity, Treatment Outcome, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review