The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Blood culture bottle culture of pleural fluid in pleural infection
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Pleural infection is common, and has a >30% major morbidity and mortality-particularly when infection is caused by Gram-negative, Staphylococcus aureus or mixed aerobic pathogens. Standard pleural fluid culture is negative in ∼40% of cases. Culturing pleural fluid in blood culture bottles may increase microbial yield, and is cheap and easy to perform. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether inoculating pleural fluid into blood culture bottles increases the culture positivity of pleural infection over standard laboratory culture, and to assess the optimum volume of inoculum to introduce. METHODS: 62 patients with pleural infection were enrolled. Pairs of aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles were inoculated at the bedside with 2, 5 or 10 ml of pleural fluid, and two pleural fluid specimens were sent for standard culture. Pleural fluid from nine control patients was cultured to test for 'false-positive' results. RESULTS: The addition of blood culture bottle culture to standard culture increased the proportion of patients with identifiable pathogens by 20.8% (20/53 (37.7%) to 31/53 (58.5%) (difference 20.8%, 95% CI difference 8.9% to 20.8%, p<0.001)). The second standard culture did not similarly improve the culture positivity (19/49 (38.8%) to 22/49 (44.9%) (difference 6.1%, 95% CI difference -2.5% to 6.1%, p=0.08)). The culture inoculum volume did not influence bacterial isolation frequency. The control fluids were culture negative. CONCLUSIONS: Blood culture bottle culture of infected pleural fluid increases microbial yield when used in addition to standard culture. This technique should be part of routine care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Miller, J. M., Binnicker, M. J., Campbell, S., Carroll, K. C., Chapin, K. C., Gilligan, P. H., Gonzalez, M. D., Jerris, R. C., Kehl, S. C., Patel, R., et al. (2018) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciy381 · Cited by 641
Diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients
Azoulay, E., Russell, L., Van de Louw, A., Metaxa, V., Bauer, P., Povoa, P., Montero, J. G., Loeches, I. M., Mehta, S., Puxty, K., et al. (2020) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05906-5 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Menzies, S. M., Rahman, N. M., Wrightson, J. M., Davies, H. E., Shorten, R., Gillespie, S. H., Davies, C. W. H., Maskell, N. A., Jeffrey, A. A., Lee, Y. C. G., & Davies, R. J. O.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 658-662
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136767668
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood culture bottle culture of pleural fluid in pleural infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thx.2010.157842
- The paper
- Menzies, S. M., Rahman, N. M., Wrightson, J. M., Davies, H. E., Shorten, R., Gillespie, S. H., Davies, C. W. H., Maskell, N. A., Jeffrey, A. A., Lee, Y. C. G., & Davies, R. J. O. (2011). Blood culture bottle culture of pleural fluid in pleural infection. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2010.157842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.