Cited by 3Smoking Behavior and CessationChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseases

Howling for the moon

Open access
Barnes, N., Bush, A.·2011·Thorax

Abstract

Evaluation of subclinical respiratory tract inflammation in heavy smokers who switch to a cigarette-like nicotine delivery device

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thx.2011.161323

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In early COPD, FEV1 may not be the optimal indicator of small airways obstruction.

    “In early COPD, the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) may not be the optimal indicator of small airways obstruction.36”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, N., & Bush, A.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Royal Brompton Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Bush, A.
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-03-17
Volume
66
Issue
8
Pages
645-646
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140961961
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
heavy smokers, nicotine delivery devices, electronic cigarettes, vaping, smoking cessation, airway inflammation
MeSH terms
Child, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Spirometry, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review