The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A self management plan in the treatment of adult asthma.
Open accessAbstract
To determine whether routine assessment of peak expiratory flow (PEF) in association with a self management plan based on inhaled corticosteroid use is effective in the management of chronic asthma, 36 consecutive adult patients with asthma attending an outpatient chest clinic were admitted to an open prospective study. Patients were treated with inhaled salbutamol and beclomethasone dipropionate in an attempt to achieve normal lung function. Each patient had a "potential normal value," which was either the predicted normal or the maximum PEF value achieved by the patient, whichever was the higher. Patients measured PEF at home and if it fell by more than 30% from the potential normal value the dose of beclomethasone was doubled until PEF returned to the potential normal value, then continued at 20 mg/day for the same number of days. If PEF fell to below 150-200 l/min patients were asked to obtain emergency medical assistance. In the 30 patients who completed the trial the six months before and the six months after intervention with the self management plan were compared. There was a substantial improvement in both subjective and objective measurements of asthma severity, with a significant reduction in nights woken, days lost from work, and requirement for oral corticosteroids and a significant increase in baseline lung function. Routine measurement of PEF in association with a self management plan appears to be effective in reducing symptoms of asthma and improving lung function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
British Guideline on the Management of Asthma
British Thoracic Society Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2008) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2008.097741 · Cited by 2,021
Regular inhaled beta-agonist treatment in bronchial asthma
Sears, M. R., Taylor, D. R., Print, C. G., Lake, D. C., Li, Q., Flannery, E. M., Yates, D. M., Lucas, M. K., & Herbison, G. P. (1990) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)93098-a · Cited by 1,065
Randomised comparison of guided self management and traditional treatment of asthma over one year
Lahdensuo, A., Haahtela, T., Herrala, J., Kava, T., Kiviranta, K., Kuusisto, P., Peramaki, E., Poussa, T., Saarelainen, S., & Svahn, T. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7033.748 · Cited by 362
Woolcock, A., Seale, J. P., Rubinfeld, A. R., Landau, L. L., Antic, R., Mitchell, C., Rea, H. H., & Zimmerman, P. (1989) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb139640.x · Cited by 280
Evaluation of a self-management plan for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Watson, P., Town, G., Holbrook, N., Dwan, C., Toop, L., & Drennan, C. (1997) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.97.10061267 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Beasley, R., Cushley, M., & Holgate, S. T.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1989-03-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 200-204
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135545303
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A self management plan in the treatment of adult asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thx.44.3.200
- The paper
- Beasley, R., Cushley, M., & Holgate, S. T. (1989). A self management plan in the treatment of adult asthma. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.44.3.200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.