Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

British Thoracic Society Sarcoidosis study: effects of long term corticosteroid treatment.

Open access
Gibson, G J, Prescott, R J, Muers, M F, Middleton, W G, Mitchell, D N, Connolly, C K, Harrison, B D·1996·Thorax

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids suppress disease activity in pulmonary sarcoidosis and their use produces symptomatic, radiographic, and functional improvement. There is, however, uncertainty regarding their effects on the overall natural history of the condition and long term benefit is unproven. METHODS: Patients with pulmonary radiographic shadowing due to sarcoidosis were recruited in a multicentre study. Those who, in the first six months after entry to the study, neither required prednisolone for symptoms nor showed radiographic improvement were allocated at six months to receive either long term steroid treatment (group L) or selective treatment (group S), with regular assessment over the subsequent five years. Patients in group L were scheduled to receive steroid treatment for at least 18 months with the policy of achieving and maintaining maximal radiographic clearing, while in group S treatment was reserved for use only if warranted by later development of symptoms or deteriorating lung function. Symptoms, radiographic appearances, and respiratory function were assessed periodically during the study. RESULTS: One hundred and forty nine patients were followed: 33 required prednisolone for troublesome symptoms within six months of entry and 58 showed radiographic improvement over this period. The remaining 58 patients were allocated to groups L (n = 27) and S (n = 31). Patients in group L showed greater improvements in symptoms, respiratory function, and radiographic appearances than those in group S, although the differences were not large. After adjusting for differences at the time of allocation, the average difference in vital capacity between groups L and S at final assessment was 9% of the predicted value. Side effects of treatment were frequent but usually mild, necessitating withdrawal in only two individuals. CONCLUSIONS: After excluding those individuals who required steroids for control of symptoms, approximately half of the remaining patients with sarcoidosis and pulmonary shadowing showed spontaneous radiographic improvement during six months of observation. In those in whom the radiograph failed to improve, prolonged steroid treatment with the aim of optimising radiographic appearances resulted in a significantly better long term functional outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thx.51.3.238

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Gibson, G. J., Prescott, R. J., Muers, M. F., Middleton, W. G., Mitchell, D. N., Connolly, C. K., & Harrison, B. D.
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1996-03-01
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
238-247
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147469461
Cited by
348
References
0
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: British Thoracic Society Sarcoidosis study: effects of long term corticosteroid treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thx.51.3.238
The paper
Gibson, G. J., Prescott, R. J., Muers, M. F., Middleton, W. G., Mitchell, D. N., Connolly, C. K., & Harrison, B. D. (1996). British Thoracic Society Sarcoidosis study: effects of long term corticosteroid treatment. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.51.3.238

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.