The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Passive smoking and sudden infant death syndrome: review of the epidemiological evidence
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: This paper provides a systematic, quantitative review of the epidemiological evidence relating parental smoking and sudden infant death. METHODS: Thirty two relevant publications were identified after consideration of 692 articles selected by electronic search of the Embase and Medline databases using keywords and Mesh headings relevant to passive smoking in children. Eleven further articles were identified from reviews and by talking to authors. The search was completed in April 1997 and identified 39 studies. RESULTS: The unadjusted pooled odds ratio for prenatal maternal smoking was 2.77 (95% CI 2.45 to 3.13). After adjustment for a variety of confounders the pooled odds ratio was reduced to 2.08 (95% CI 1.83 to 2.38) and was similar in cohort and case-control studies. Four studies reported on maternal postnatal smoking after controlling for prenatal maternal smoking (pooled odds ratio 1.94 (95% CI 1.55 to 2.43)). Of three studies reporting on the risk of paternal smoking where the mother was a non-smoker, two found significant effects while one found no effect. Dose-response relationships with both prenatal and postnatal maternal smoking were present in most studies which provided data. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal smoking doubles the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. The relationship is almost certainly causal. There is good evidence that postnatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke from both mother and father are important. Because prenatal smoking is almost invariably associated with postnatal smoking, the role of prenatal smoking per se will be difficult to resolve using epidemiological studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cnattingius, S. (2004) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200410001669187 · Cited by 1,126
Perinatal complications associated with maternal tobacco use
Andres, R. L., & Day, M.-C. (2000) · Seminars in Neonatology · doi:10.1053/siny.2000.0025 · Cited by 524
Infant Morbidity and Mortality Attributable to Prenatal Smoking in the U.S.
Dietz, P. M., England, L. J., Shapiro-Mendoza, C. K., Tong, V. T., Farr, S. L., & Callaghan, W. M. (2010) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.009 · Cited by 363
Risks and Benefits of Nicotine to Aid Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy
Dempsey, D. A., & Benowitz, N. L. (2001) · Drug Safety · doi:10.2165/00002018-200124040-00005 · Cited by 346
Florescu, A., Ferrence, R., Einarson, T., Selby, P., Soldin, O., & Koren, G. (2009) · Therapeutic Drug Monitoring · doi:10.1097/ftd.0b013e3181957a3b · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, H. R., & Cook, D. G.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1997-11-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1003-1009
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141715151
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Passive smoking and sudden infant death syndrome: review of the epidemiological evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thx.52.11.1003
- The paper
- Anderson, H. R., & Cook, D. G. (1997). Passive smoking and sudden infant death syndrome: review of the epidemiological evidence. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.52.11.1003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.