The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electronic cigarettes: human health effects
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: With the rapid increase in use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), such as electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), users and non-users are exposed to the aerosol and product constituents. This is a review of published data on the human health effects of exposure to e-cigarettes and their components. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted through September 2013 using multiple electronic databases. RESULTS: Forty-four articles are included in this analysis. E-cigarette aerosols may contain propylene glycol, glycerol, flavourings, other chemicals and, usually, nicotine. Aerosolised propylene glycol and glycerol produce mouth and throat irritation and dry cough. No data on the effects of flavouring inhalation were identified. Data on short-term health effects are limited and there are no adequate data on long-term effects. Aerosol exposure may be associated with respiratory function impairment, and serum cotinine levels are similar to those in traditional cigarette smokers. The high nicotine concentrations of some products increase exposure risks for non-users, particularly children. The dangers of secondhand and thirdhand aerosol exposure have not been thoroughly evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Scientific evidence regarding the human health effects of e-cigarettes is limited. While e-cigarette aerosol may contain fewer toxicants than cigarette smoke, studies evaluating whether e-cigarettes are less harmful than cigarettes are inconclusive. Some evidence suggests that e-cigarette use may facilitate smoking cessation, but definitive data are lacking. No e-cigarette has been approved by FDA as a cessation aid. Environmental concerns and issues regarding non-user exposure exist. The health impact of e-cigarettes, for users and the public, cannot be determined with currently available data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tobacco-product use by adults and youths in the United States in 2013 and 2014
Kasza, K. A., Ambrose, B. K., Conway, K. P., Borek, N., Taylor, K., Goniewicz, M. L., Cummings, K. M., Sharma, E., Pearson, J. L., Green, V. R., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1607538 · Cited by 609
Siu, A. L., & for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force* (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-2023 · Cited by 515
Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review
Glasser, A. M., Collins, L., Pearson, J. L., Abudayyeh, H., Niaura, R. S., Abrams, D. B., & Villanti, A. C. (2017) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.036 · Cited by 473
Allen, J. G., Flanigan, S. S., LeBlanc, M., Vallarino, J., MacNaughton, P., Stewart, J. H., & Christiani, D. C. (2016) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1510185 · Cited by 469
Electronic Cigarette Use and Respiratory Symptoms in Adolescents
McConnell, R., Barrington-Trimis, J. L., Wang, K., Urman, R., Hong, H., Unger, J., Samet, J., Leventhal, A., & Berhane, K. (2017) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201604-0804oc · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Callahan-Lyon, P.
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2014-04-14
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- suppl 2
- Pages
- ii36-ii40
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2144345975
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electronic cigarettes: human health effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051470
- The paper
- Callahan-Lyon, P. (2014). Electronic cigarettes: human health effects. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051470
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.