Cited by 27Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Seroprevalence of feline heartworm disease in Tuscany

Open access
Magi, M., Sebastiani, B., Bandecchi, P., Prati, M. C., Guberti, V.·2002·Veterinary Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/vr.150.13.415

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magi, M., Sebastiani, B., Bandecchi, P., Prati, M. C., & Guberti, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
  • Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica Ozzano Emilia BO Italy
Venue
Veterinary Record
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-03
Volume
150
Issue
13
Pages
415-416
ISSN
  • 0042-4900 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-7670
OpenAlex
W1993631753
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Veterinary Record (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
feline heartworm disease, seroprevalence, Dirofilaria immitis, Tuscany
MeSH terms
Animals, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dirofilariasis, Female, France, Male, Logistic Models, Seroepidemiologic Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review