Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 400

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survey of the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of dermatological conditions in small animals in general practice

Open access
Hill, P. B., Lo, A., Eden, C. A. N., Huntley, S., Morey, V., Ramsey, S., Richardson, C., Smith, D. J., Sutton, C., Taylor, M. D., Thorpe, E., Tidmarsh, R., Williams, V.·2006·Veterinary Record

Abstract

A survey was made of the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of dermatological conditions in small animals in general practice in the UK . Out of 3707 small animal consultations in general practice that were observed and recorded, 795 (21·4 per cent) involved animals that had a dermatological problem. In dogs and exotic species, pruritus was the most common presenting sign, accounting for 30 to 40 per cent of the dermatological consultations. In cats, cutaneous swellings were the most common presentation (36 per cent). A diagnosis or recommendation for treatment was made on the basis of the presenting clinical signs and physical examination alone in 576 (72 per cent) of the cases, and various diagnostic tests were performed in the other cases. In dogs, parasitic infestations, bacterial infections and neoplasia accounted for the majority of the diagnoses. In cats, parasites and bacterial infections were the most common. In exotic species, parasites accounted for over 80 per cent of the dermatological diagnoses. In dogs, the most common final diagnoses were otitis, pyoderma, anal sac impaction, flea infestation and atopic dermatitis. In cats, abscesses, flea infestation, and otitis were the most common diagnoses. In exotic species, the most common diagnosis was an unspecified mite infestation. Systemic antibiotics were prescribed in 196 cases (25 per cent), systemic glucocorticoids were prescribed in 162 cases (20 per cent) and treatment with an ectoparasiticide was prescribed in 167 cases (21 per cent).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/vr.158.16.533

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Metadata

Authors
Hill, P. B., Lo, A., Eden, C. A. N., Huntley, S., Morey, V., Ramsey, S., Richardson, C., Smith, D. J., Sutton, C., Taylor, M. D., Thorpe, E., Tidmarsh, R., & Williams, V.
Venue
Veterinary Record
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04
Volume
158
Issue
16
Pages
533-539
ISSN
  • 0042-4900 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-7670
OpenAlex
W1993420837
Cited by
400
References
5
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survey of the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of dermatological conditions in small animals in general practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/vr.158.16.533
The paper
Hill, P. B., Lo, A., Eden, C. A. N., Huntley, S., Morey, V., Ramsey, S., Richardson, C., Smith, D. J., Sutton, C., Taylor, M. D., Thorpe, E., Tidmarsh, R., & Williams, V. (2006). Survey of the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of dermatological conditions in small animals in general practice. Veterinary Record. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.158.16.533

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.