Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimal Computer Search Trees and Variable-Length Alphabetical Codes

Hu, T. C., Tucker, A. C.·1971·SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics

Abstract

An algorithm is given for constructing an alphabetic binary tree of minimum weighted path length (for short, an optimal alphabetic tree). The algorithm needs $4n^2 + 2n$ operations and $4n$ storage locations, where n is the number of terminal nodes in the tree. A given binary tree corresponds to a computer search procedure, where the given files or letters (represented by terminal nodes) are partitioned into two parts successively until a particular file or letter is finally identified. If the files or letters are listed alphabetically, such as a dictionary, then the binary tree must have, from left to right, the terminal nodes consecutively. Since different letters have different frequencies (weights) of occurring, an alphabetic tree of minimum weighted path length corresponds to a computer search tree with minimum-mean search time. A binary tree also represents a (variable-length) binary code. In an alphabetic binary code, the numerical binary order of the code words corresponds to the alphabetical order of the encoded letters. An optimal alphabetic tree corresponds to an optimal alphabetic binary code.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/0121057

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hu, T. C., & Tucker, A. C.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics
Published
1971-12
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
514-532
ISSN
  • 0036-1399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-712X
OpenAlex
W2065954102
Cited by
287
References
0
FWCI
8.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.