The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Authenticated Algorithms for Byzantine Agreement
Abstract
Reaching agreement in a distributed system in the presence of faulty processors is a central issue for reliable computer systems. Using an authentication protocol, one can limit the undetected behavior of faulty processors to a simple failure to relay messages to all intended targets. In this paper we show that, in spite of such an ability to limit faulty behavior, and no matter what message types or protocols are allowed, reaching (Byzantine) agreement requires at least $t + 1$ phases or rounds of information exchange, where t is an upper bound on the number of faulty processors. We present algorithms for reaching agreement based on authentication that require a total number of messages sent by correctly operating processors that is polynomial in both t and the number of processors, n. The best algorithm uses only $t + 1$ phases and $O(nt)$ messages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359340.359342 · Cited by 13,462
Cited by
Consensus in the presence of partial synchrony
Dwork, C., Lynch, N., & Stockmeyer, L. (1988) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/42282.42283 · Cited by 1,909
Survey on blockchain for Internet of Things
Wang, X., Zha, X., Ni, W., Liu, R. P., Guo, Y. J., Niu, X., & Zheng, K. (2019) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2019.01.006 · Cited by 567
Synchronizing clocks in the presence of faults
Lamport, L., & Melliar-Smith, P. M. (1985) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2455.2457 · Cited by 543
ATOMIC BROADCAST: FROM SIMPLE MESSAGE DIFFUSION TO BYZANTINE AGREEMENT
Cristian, F., Aghili, H., Strong, R., & Volev, D. (2005) · Twenty-Fifth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, 1995, ' Highlights from Twenty-Five Years'. · doi:10.1109/ftcsh.1995.532668 · Cited by 353
Byzantine-Resilient Secure Federated Learning
So, J., Guler, B., & Avestimehr, A. S. (2021) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2020.3041404 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Dolev, D., & Strong, H. R.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Computing
- Published
- 1983-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 656-666
- ISSN
- 0097-5397 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2034791526
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Authenticated Algorithms for Byzantine Agreement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0212045
- The paper
- Dolev, D., & Strong, H. R. (1983). Authenticated Algorithms for Byzantine Agreement. SIAM Journal on Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/0212045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.