Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Average Case Complete Problems

Levin, Leonid A.·1986·SIAM Journal on Computing

Abstract

Many interesting combinatorial problems were found to be NP-complete. Since there is little hope to solve them fast in the worst case, researchers look for algorithms which are fast just “on average”. This matter is sensitive to the choice of a particular NP-complete problem and a probability distribution of its instances. Some of these tasks were easy and some not. But one needs a way to distinguish the “difficult on average” problems. Such negative results could not only save “positive” efforts but may also be used in areas (like cryptography) where hardness of some problems is a frequent assumption. It is shown below that the Tiling problem with uniform distribution of instances has no polynomial “on average” algorithm, unless every NP-problem with every simple probability distribution has it. It is interesting to try to prove similar statements for other NP-problems which resisted so far “average case” attacks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/0215020

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
Levin, L. A.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Computing
Published
1986-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
285-286
ISSN
  • 0097-5397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7111
OpenAlex
W2100008268
Cited by
424
References
0
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Average Case Complete Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0215020
The paper
Levin, L. A. (1986). Average Case Complete Problems. SIAM Journal on Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/0215020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.