The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Digital Signature Scheme Secure Against Adaptive Chosen-Message Attacks
Abstract
We present a digital signature scheme based on the computational difficulty of integer factorization. The scheme possesses the novel property of being robust against an adaptive chosen-message attack: an adversary who receives signatures for messages of his choice (where each message may be chosen in a way that depends on the signatures of previously chosen messages) cannot later forge the signature of even a single additional message. This may be somewhat surprising, since in the folklore the properties of having forgery being equivalent to factoring and being invulnerable to an adaptive chosen-message attack were considered to be contradictory. More generally, we show how to construct a signature scheme with such properties based on the existence of a “claw-free” pair of permutations—a potentially weaker assumption than the intractibility of integer factorization. The new scheme is potentially practical: signing and verifying signatures are reasonably fast, and signatures are compact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359340.359342 · Cited by 13,462
Self-citationA public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete logarithms
Elgamal, T. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1985.1057074 · Cited by 8,059
Cited by
Entity Authentication and Key Distribution
Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48329-2_21 · Cited by 1,752
How to time-stamp a digital document
Haber, S., & Stornetta, W. S. (1991) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/bf00196791 · Cited by 1,483
Non-interactive zero-knowledge and its applications
Blum, M., Feldman, P., & Micali, S. (1988) · Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '88 · doi:10.1145/62212.62222 · Cited by 904
Self-citationUniversally Composable Notions of Key Exchange and Secure Channels
Canetti, R., & Krawczyk, H. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-46035-7_22 · Cited by 746
Micali, S. (2000) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539795284959 · Cited by 424
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., & Rivest, R. L.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Computing
- Published
- 1988-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-308
- ISSN
- 0097-5397 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2151413173
- Cited by
- 2,804
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Digital Signature Scheme Secure Against Adaptive Chosen-Message Attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0217017
- The paper
- Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., & Rivest, R. L. (1988). A Digital Signature Scheme Secure Against Adaptive Chosen-Message Attacks. SIAM Journal on Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/0217017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.