The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Order Collocation Methods for Differential Equations with Random Inputs
Open accessAbstract
Recently there has been a growing interest in designing efficient methods for the solution of ordinary/partial differential equations with random inputs. To this end, stochastic Galerkin methods appear to be superior to other nonsampling methods and, in many cases, to several sampling methods. However, when the governing equations take complicated forms, numerical implementations of stochastic Galerkin methods can become nontrivial and care is needed to design robust and efficient solvers for the resulting equations. On the other hand, the traditional sampling methods, e.g., Monte Carlo methods, are straightforward to implement, but they do not offer convergence as fast as stochastic Galerkin methods. In this paper, a high-order stochastic collocation approach is proposed. Similar to stochastic Galerkin methods, the collocation methods take advantage of an assumption of smoothness of the solution in random space to achieve fast convergence. However, the numerical implementation of stochastic collocation is trivial, as it requires only repetitive runs of an existing deterministic solver, similar to Monte Carlo methods. The computational cost of the collocation methods depends on the choice of the collocation points, and we present several feasible constructions. One particular choice, basedon sparse grids, depends weakly on the dimensionality of the random space and is more suitable for highly accurate computations of practical applications with large dimensional random inputs. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the stochastic collocation methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice
(1995) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14835 · Cited by 7,757
Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus
(2007) · Springer Finance · doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-696-4_13 · Cited by 7,422
Loève, M. (1963) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,938
Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach
Ghanem, R., & Spanos, P. D. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3094-6 · Cited by 5,851
Gammaitoni, L., Hänggi, P., Jung, P., & Marchesoni, F. (1998) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.223 · Cited by 5,443
Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations
Kloeden, P. E., & Platen, E. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12616-5 · Cited by 5,060
Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations
(2016) · doi:10.5194/gmd-2016-45-rc1 · Cited by 5,002
The Wiener--Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations
Xiu, D., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2002) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827501387826 · Cited by 4,807
Self-citationStochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications.
Jacka, S. D., & Oksendal, B. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288814 · Cited by 3,964
Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences
Gardiner, C. W. (1985) · Springer Series in Synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02452-2 · Cited by 3,703
Cited by
Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression
Blatman, G., & Sudret, B. (2011) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.021 · Cited by 1,502
Blatman, G., & Sudret, B. (2010) · Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.10.003 · Cited by 832
Uncertainty Quantification and Polynomial Chaos Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics
Najm, H. N. (2009) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165248 · Cited by 768
An Introduction to Computational Stochastic PDEs
Lord, G. J., Powell, C. E., & Shardlow, T. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139017329 · Cited by 537
On the convergence of generalized polynomial chaos expansions
Ernst, O. G., Mugler, A., Starkloff, H.-J., & Ullmann, E. (2012) · ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis · doi:10.1051/m2an/2011045 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiu, D., & Hesthaven, J. S.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1118-1139
- ISSN
- 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2143591652
- Cited by
- 1,522
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 30.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Order Collocation Methods for Differential Equations with Random Inputs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/040615201
- The paper
- Xiu, D., & Hesthaven, J. S. (2005). High-Order Collocation Methods for Differential Equations with Random Inputs. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/040615201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.