The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Direct Formulation for Sparse PCA Using Semidefinite Programming
Abstract
Given a covariance matrix, we consider the problem of maximizing the variance explained by a particular linear combination of the input variables while constraining the number of nonzero coefficients in this combination. This problem arises in the decomposition of a covariance matrix into sparse factors or sparse principal component analysis (PCA), and has wide applications ranging from biology to finance. We use a modification of the classical variational representation of the largest eigenvalue of a symmetric matrix, where cardinality is constrained, and derive a semidefinite programming–based relaxation for our problem. We also discuss Nesterov's smooth minimization technique applied to the semidefinite program arising in the semidefinite relaxation of the sparse PCA problem. The method has complexity $O(n^4 \sqrt{\log(n)}/\epsilon)$, where n is the size of the underlying covariance matrix and $\epsilon$ is the desired absolute accuracy on the optimal value of the problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Sparse Principal Component Analysis
Zou, H., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2006) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/106186006x113430 · Cited by 3,152
Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix, Twenty-Five Years Later
Moler, C., & Van Loan, C. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s00361445024180 · Cited by 2,357
Cited by
Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments
Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 · Cited by 10,117
Feature Selection: A Data Perspective
Li, J., Cheng, K., Wang, S., Morstatter, F., Trevino, R. P., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3136625 · Cited by 2,442
Majorization-Minimization Algorithms in Signal Processing, Communications, and Machine Learning
Sun, Y., Babu, P., & Palomar, D. P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2016.2601299 · Cited by 1,820
Convex and Semi-Nonnegative Matrix Factorizations
Ding, C. H. Q., Li, T., & Jordan, M. I. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.277 · Cited by 1,317
Self-citationInverse problems in systems biology
Engl, H. W., Flamm, C., Kügler, P., Lu, J., Müller, S., & Schuster, P. (2009) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/25/12/123014 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- d'Aspremont, A., El Ghaoui, L., Jordan, M. I., & Lanckriet, G. R. G.
- Venue
- SIAM Review
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 434-448
- ISSN
- 0036-1445 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7200
- OpenAlex
- W2615253071
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 35.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Direct Formulation for Sparse PCA Using Semidefinite Programming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/050645506
- The paper
- d'Aspremont, A., El Ghaoui, L., Jordan, M. I., & Lanckriet, G. R. G. (2007). A Direct Formulation for Sparse PCA Using Semidefinite Programming. SIAM Review. https://doi.org/10.1137/050645506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.