The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation of Subspace Arrangements with Applications in Modeling and Segmenting Mixed Data
Open accessAbstract
Recently many scientific and engineering applications have involved the challenging task of analyzing large amounts of unsorted high-dimensional data that have very complicated structures. From both geometric and statistical points of view, such unsorted data are considered mixed as different parts of the data have significantly different structures which cannot be described by a single model. In this paper we propose to use subspace arrangements—a union of multiple subspaces—for modeling mixed data: each subspace in the arrangement is used to model just a homogeneous subset of the data. Thus, multiple subspaces together can capture the heterogeneous structures within the data set. In this paper, we give a comprehensive introduction to a new approach for the estimation of subspace arrangements. This is known as generalized principal component analysis (GPCA). In particular, we provide a comprehensive summary of important algebraic properties and statistical facts that are crucial for making the inference of subspace arrangements both efficient and robust, even when the given data are corrupted by noise or contaminated with outliers. This new method in many ways improves and generalizes extant methods for modeling or clustering mixed data. There have been successful applications of this new method to many real-world problems in computer vision, image processing, and system identification. In this paper, we will examine several of those representative applications. This paper is intended to be expository in nature. However, in order that this may serve as a more complete reference for both theoreticians and practitioners, we take the liberty of filling in several gaps between the theory and the practice in the existing literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381607a0 · Cited by 5,694
Fitting conic sections to "very scattered" data: An iterative refinement of the bookstein algorithm
Sampson, P. D. (1982) · Computer Graphics and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/0146-664x(82)90101-0 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, Y., Yang, A. Y., Derksen, H., & Fossum, R.
- Venue
- SIAM Review
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 413-458
- ISSN
- 0036-1445 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7200
- OpenAlex
- W2003361735
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of Subspace Arrangements with Applications in Modeling and Segmenting Mixed Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/060655523
- The paper
- Ma, Y., Yang, A. Y., Derksen, H., & Fossum, R. (2008). Estimation of Subspace Arrangements with Applications in Modeling and Segmenting Mixed Data. SIAM Review. https://doi.org/10.1137/060655523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.