The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimating the Largest Eigenvalue by the Power and Lanczos Algorithms with a Random Start
Open accessAbstract
This paper addresses the problem of computing an approximation to the largest eigenvalue of an $n \times n$ large symmetric positive definite matrix with relative error at most $\varepsilon $. Only algorithms that use Krylov information $[b,Ab, \cdots ,A^k b]$ consisting of k matrix-vector multiplications for some unit vector b are considered. If the vector b is chosen deterministically, then the problem cannot be solved no matter how many matrix-vector multiplications are performed and what algorithm is used. If, however, the vector b is chosen randomly with respect to the uniform distribution over the unit sphere, then the problem can be solved on the average and probabilistically. More precisely, for a randomly chosen vector b, the power and Lanczos algorithms are studied. For the power algorithm (method), sharp bounds on the average relative error and on the probabilistic relative failure are proven. For the Lanczos algorithm only upper bounds are presented. In particular, $\ln ( n )/( n ) k $ characterizes the average relative error of the power algorithm, whereas $O( ( \ln ( n )/ k )^2 )$ is an upper bound on the average relative error of the Lanczos algorithm. In the probabilistic case, the algorithm is characterized by its probabilistic relative failure, which is defined as the measure of the set of vectors b for which the algorithm fails. It is shown that the probabilistic relative failure goes to zero roughly as $\sqrt n (1 - \varepsilon )^k $ for the power algorithm and at most as $\sqrt n e^{ - (2k - 1)\sqrt \varepsilon } $ for the Lanczos algorithm. These bounds are for a worst case distribution of eigenvalues which may depend on k. The behavior in the average and probabilistic cases of the two algorithms for a fixed matrix A is also studied as the number of matrix-vector multiplications k increases. The bounds for the power algorithm depend then on the ratio of the two largest eigenvalues and their multiplicities. The bounds for the Lanczos algorithm depend on the ratio between the difference of the two largest eigenvalues and the difference of the largest and the smallest eigenvalues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Randomized algorithms for the low-rank approximation of matrices
Liberty, E., Woolfe, F., Martinsson, P.-G., Rokhlin, V., & Tygert, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709640104 · Cited by 559
A Randomized Algorithm for Principal Component Analysis
Rokhlin, V., Szlam, A., & Tygert, M. (2010) · SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1137/080736417 · Cited by 422
An Algorithm for the Principal Component Analysis of Large Data Sets
Halko, N., Martinsson, P.-G., Shkolnisky, Y., & Tygert, M. (2011) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/100804139 · Cited by 291
A fast randomized algorithm for the approximation of matrices
Woolfe, F., Liberty, E., Rokhlin, V., & Tygert, M. (2008) · Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.acha.2007.12.002 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuczyński, J., & Woźniakowski, H.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1094-1122
- ISSN
- 0895-4798 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7162
- OpenAlex
- W2040466831
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the Largest Eigenvalue by the Power and Lanczos Algorithms with a Random Start. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0613066
- The paper
- Kuczyński, J., & Woźniakowski, H. (1992). Estimating the Largest Eigenvalue by the Power and Lanczos Algorithms with a Random Start. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1137/0613066
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.