The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Differentiation of Pseudo-Inverses and Nonlinear Least Squares Problems Whose Variables Separate
Abstract
For given data $(t_i ,y_i ),i = 1, \cdots ,m$, we consider the least squares fit of nonlinear models of the form \[ \eta ({\bf a},{\boldsymbol \alpha} ;t) = \sum _{j = 1}^n {a_j \varphi _j ({\boldsymbol \alpha} ;t),\qquad {\bf a} \in \mathcal{R}^n ,\qquad {\boldsymbol \alpha} \in \mathcal{R}^k .} \] For this purpose we study the minimization of the nonlinear functional \[ r({\bf a},{\boldsymbol \alpha} ) = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^m {\left( {y_i - \eta \left( {{\bf a},{\boldsymbol \alpha} ,t_i } \right)} \right)^2 } . \] It is shown that by defining the matrix $\{ {\bf \Phi} ({\boldsymbol \alpha} )\} _{i,j} = \varphi _j ({\boldsymbol \alpha} ;t_i )$, and the modified functional $r_2 ({\boldsymbol \alpha} ) = \| {\bf y} - {\bf \Phi} ({\boldsymbol \alpha} ){\bf \Phi} ^ + ({\boldsymbol \alpha} ){\bf y} \|_2^2 $, it is possible to optimize first with respect to the parameters ${\boldsymbol \alpha} $, and then to obtain, a posteriors, the optimal parameters $\bf {\hat a}$. The matrix ${\bf \Phi} ^ + ({\boldsymbol{\alpha}} )$ is the Moore–Penrose generalized inverse of ${\bf \Phi} ({\boldsymbol{\alpha}} )$. We develop formulas for the Frechet derivative of orthogonal projectors associated with ${\bf \Phi} ({\boldsymbol{\alpha}} )$ and also for ${\bf \Phi} ^ + ({\boldsymbol{\alpha}} )$, under the hypothesis that ${\bf \Phi} ({\boldsymbol{\alpha}} )$ is of constant (though not necessarily full) rank. Detailed algorithms are presented which make extensive use of well-known reliable linear least squares techniques, and numerical results and comparisons are given. These results are generalizations of those of H. D. Scolnik [20] and Guttman, Pereyra and Scolnik [9].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · Cited by 86,835
Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data
Mosher, J. C., Lewis, P. S., & Leahy, R. M. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.141192 · Cited by 1,048
Separable nonlinear least squares: the variable projection method and its applications
Golub, G., & Pereyra, V. (2003) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/19/2/201 · Cited by 760
Self-citationA spline least squares method for numerical parameter estimation in differential equations
Varah, J. M. (1982) · SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing · doi:10.1137/0903003 · Cited by 274
Trimmed constrained mixed effects models: formulations and algorithms
Zheng, P., Barber, R., Sorensen, R. J. D., Murray, C. J. L., & Aravkin, A. Y. (2021) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2020.1868303 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Golub, G. H., & Pereyra, V.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis
- Published
- 1973-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 413-432
- ISSN
- 0036-1429 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7170
- OpenAlex
- W2018089423
- Cited by
- 1,430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Differentiation of Pseudo-Inverses and Nonlinear Least Squares Problems Whose Variables Separate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0710036
- The paper
- Golub, G. H., & Pereyra, V. (1973). The Differentiation of Pseudo-Inverses and Nonlinear Least Squares Problems Whose Variables Separate. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1137/0710036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.