The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Practical Approximate Solutions to Linear Operator Equations When the Data are Noisy
Abstract
We consider approximate solutions $f_{n,\lambda } $ to linear operator equations $\mathcal{K}f = g$, of the form: $f_{n,\lambda } $ is the minimizer in $\mathcal{H}$ of $({1 / n})\sum _{j = 1}^n {[(\mathcal{K}h)(t_j ) - y(t_j )]} ^2 + \lambda \| h \|^2 $, where $\mathcal{H}$ is a Hilbert space, and the data $\{ {y(t_j )} \}$ satisfy $y(t_j ) = g(t_j ) + \varepsilon (t_j )$, the $\{ {\varepsilon (t_j )} \}$ being measurement errors. $f_{n,\lambda } $ is the so-called regularized solution, and $\lambda > 0$ is the regularization parameter, to be chosen. It is important to choose $\lambda $ correctly. The purpose of this paper is to propose the method of weighted cross-validation for choosing $\lambda $from the data. We suppose that g is very smooth and the errors are white noise. It is shown that the weighted cross-validation estimate $\hat \lambda $ estimates the value of $\lambda $ which minimizes $({1 / n})E\sum\nolimits_{j = 1}^n {[(\mathcal{K}f_{n,\lambda } )(t_j ) - (\mathcal{K}f)(t_j )]} ^2 $ . Results related to the convergence of $\| {f - f_{n,\hat \lambda } } \|$, including rates, are obtained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Cited by
A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection
Arlot, S., & Celisse, A. (2010) · Statistics Surveys · doi:10.1214/09-ss054 · Cited by 3,522
Craven, P., & Wahba, G. (1978) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01404567 · Cited by 3,388
Self-citationWold, S., Ruhe, A., Wold, H., & Dunn, III (1984) · SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing · doi:10.1137/0905052 · Cited by 2,529
The multivariate calibration problem in chemistry solved by the PLS method
Wold, S., Martens, H., & Wold, H. (1983) · Lecture notes in mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0062108 · Cited by 1,185
Linear inverse problems in imaging
Ribes, A., & Schmitt, F. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.923099 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Wahba, G.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis
- Published
- 1977-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 651-667
- ISSN
- 0036-1429 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7170
- OpenAlex
- W2137645797
- Cited by
- 798
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practical Approximate Solutions to Linear Operator Equations When the Data are Noisy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0714044
- The paper
- Wahba, G. (1977). Practical Approximate Solutions to Linear Operator Equations When the Data are Noisy. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1137/0714044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.