The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct Search Methods on Parallel Machines
Abstract
This paper describes an approach to constructing derivative-free algorithms for unconstrained optimization that are easy to implement on parallel machines. A special feature of this approach is the ease with which algorithms can be generated to take advantage of any number of processors and to adapt to any cost ratio of communication to function evaluation. Numerical tests show speed-ups on two fronts. The cost of synchronization being minimal, the speed-up is almost linear with the addition of more processors, i.e., given a problem and a search strategy, the decrease in execution time is proportional to the number of processors added. Even more encouraging, however, is that different search strategies, devised to take advantage of additional (or more powerful) processors, may actually lead to dramatic improvements in the performance of the basic algorithm. Thus search strategies intended for many processors actually may generate algorithms that are better even when implemented sequentially. The key difference is that the additional processors are not used simply to enhance the performance of an inherently sequential algorithm; they are used to spur the design of ever more ambitious—and effective—search strategies. The algorithms given here are supported by a strong convergence theorem, promising computational results on a variety of problems, and an intuitively appealing interpretation as multidirectional line search methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Cited by
A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates
Booker, A. J., Dennis, J. E., Frank, P. D., Serafini, D. B., Torczon, V., & Trosset, M. W. (1999) · Structural Optimization · doi:10.1007/bf01197708 · Cited by 960
Self-citationBiegler, L. T., & Grossmann, I. E. (2004) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2003.11.003 · Cited by 593
Pattern Search Algorithms for Bound Constrained Minimization
Lewis, R. M., & Torczon, V. (1999) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/s1052623496300507 · Cited by 494
Self-citationMultidisciplinary aerospace design optimization - Survey of recent developments
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., & Haftka, R. (1996) · 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.1996-711 · Cited by 417
A Survey of Medical Image Registration on Multicore and the GPU
Shams, R., Sadeghi, P., Kennedy, R., & Hartley, R. (2010) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2009.935387 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Dennis, Jr., & Torczon, V.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Optimization
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 448-474
- ISSN
- 1052-6234 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7189
- OpenAlex
- W4244913592
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct Search Methods on Parallel Machines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0801027
- The paper
- Dennis, Jr., & Torczon, V. (1991). Direct Search Methods on Parallel Machines. SIAM Journal on Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1137/0801027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.