Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Iterated Kalman Smoother as a Gauss–Newton Method

Bell, Bradley M.·1994·SIAM Journal on Optimization

Abstract

The Kalman smoother is known to be the maximum likelihood estimator when the measurement and transition functions are affine; i.e., a linear function plus a constant. A new proof of this result is presented that shows that the Kalman smoother decomposes a large least squares problem into a sequence of much smaller problems. The iterated Kalman smoother is then presented and shown to be a Gauss–Newton method for maximizing the likelihood function in the nonaffine case. This method takes advantage of the decomposition obtained with the Kalman smoother.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/0804035

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Bell, B. M.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Optimization
Published
1994-08
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
626-636
ISSN
  • 1052-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7189
OpenAlex
W2091077439
Cited by
163
References
0
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Iterated Kalman Smoother as a Gauss–Newton Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0804035
The paper
Bell, B. M. (1994). The Iterated Kalman Smoother as a Gauss–Newton Method. SIAM Journal on Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1137/0804035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.