The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interior Point Methods in Semidefinite Programming with Applications to Combinatorial Optimization
Abstract
This paper studies the semidefinite programming SDP problem, i.e., the optimization problem of a linear function of a symmetric matrix subject to linear equality constraints and the additional condition that the matrix be positive semidefinite. First the classical cone duality is reviewed as it is specialized to SDP is reviewed. Next an interior point algorithm is presented that converges to the optimal solution in polynomial time. The approach is a direct extension of Ye’s projective method for linear programming. It is also argued that many known interior point methods for linear programs can be transformed in a mechanical way to algorithms for SDP with proofs of convergence and polynomial time complexity carrying over in a similar fashion. Finally, the significance of these results is studied in a variety of combinatorial optimization problems including the general 0-1 integer programs, the maximum clique and maximum stable set problems in perfect graphs, the maximum k-partite subgraph problem in graphs, and various graph partitioning and cut problems. As a result, barrier oracles are presented for certain combinatorial optimization problems (in particular, clique and stable set problem for perfect graphs) whose linear programming formulation requires exponentially many inequalities. Existence of such barrier oracles refutes the commonly believed notion that to solve a combinatorial optimization problem with interior point methods, its linear programming formulation is eeded explicitly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goemans, M. X., & Williamson, D. P. (1995) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/227683.227684 · Cited by 3,587
Cited by
Goemans, M. X., & Williamson, D. P. (1995) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/227683.227684 · Cited by 3,587
Disciplined Convex Programming
Grant, M., Boyd, S., & Ye, Y. (2006) · Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications · doi:10.1007/0-387-30528-9_7 · Cited by 1,026
Domain Adaptation: Learning Bounds and Algorithms
Mansour, Y., Mohri, M., & Rostamizadeh, A. (2009) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0902.3430 · Cited by 504
Knuth, D. E. (1994) · The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics · doi:10.37236/1193 · Cited by 296
DC formulations and algorithms for sparse optimization problems
Gotoh, J.-Y., Takeda, A., & Tono, K. (2018) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-017-1181-0 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Alizadeh, F.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Optimization
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-51
- ISSN
- 1052-6234 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7189
- OpenAlex
- W1963753244
- Cited by
- 892
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interior Point Methods in Semidefinite Programming with Applications to Combinatorial Optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0805002
- The paper
- Alizadeh, F. (1995). Interior Point Methods in Semidefinite Programming with Applications to Combinatorial Optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1137/0805002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.