The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interior-Point Method for Nuclear Norm Approximation with Application to System Identification
Abstract
The nuclear norm (sum of singular values) of a matrix is often used in convex heuristics for rank minimization problems in control, signal processing, and statistics. Such heuristics can be viewed as extensions of $\ell_1$-norm minimization techniques for cardinality minimization and sparse signal estimation. In this paper we consider the problem of minimizing the nuclear norm of an affine matrix-valued function. This problem can be formulated as a semidefinite program, but the reformulation requires large auxiliary matrix variables, and is expensive to solve by general-purpose interior-point solvers. We show that problem structure in the semidefinite programming formulation can be exploited to develop more efficient implementations of interior-point methods. In the fast implementation, the cost per iteration is reduced to a quartic function of the problem dimensions and is comparable to the cost of solving the approximation problem in the Frobenius norm. In the second part of the paper, the nuclear norm approximation algorithm is applied to system identification. A variant of a simple subspace algorithm is presented in which low-rank matrix approximations are computed via nuclear norm minimization instead of the singular value decomposition. This has the important advantage of preserving linear matrix structure in the low-rank approximation. The method is shown to perform well on publicly available benchmark data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Self-citationRegression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Cited by
Kernel methods in system identification, machine learning and function estimation: A survey
Pillonetto, G., Dinuzzo, F., Chen, T., De Nicolao, G., & Ljung, L. (2014) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2014.01.001 · Cited by 741
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Z., & Vandenberghe, L.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1235-1256
- ISSN
- 0895-4798 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7162
- OpenAlex
- W2059283452
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 28.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interior-Point Method for Nuclear Norm Approximation with Application to System Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/090755436
- The paper
- Liu, Z., & Vandenberghe, L. (2010). Interior-Point Method for Nuclear Norm Approximation with Application to System Identification. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1137/090755436
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.