Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 615

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Augmented Lagrangian Method, Dual Methods, and Split Bregman Iteration for ROF, Vectorial TV, and High Order Models

Wu, Chunlin, Tai, Xue-Cheng·2010·SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences

Abstract

In image processing, the Rudin–Osher–Fatemi (ROF) model [L. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi, Phys. D, 60 (1992), pp. 259–268] based on total variation (TV) minimization has proven to be very useful. So far many researchers have contributed to designing fast numerical schemes and overcoming the nondifferentiability of the model. Methods considered to be particularly efficient for the ROF model include the Chan–Golub–Mulet (CGM) primal-dual method [T.F. Chan, G.H. Golub, and P. Mulet, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 20 (1999), pp. 1964–1977], Chambolle's dual method [A. Chambolle, J. Math. Imaging Vis., 20 (2004), pp. 89–97], the splitting and quadratic penalty-based method [Y. Wang, J. Yang, W. Yin, and Y. Zhang, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 1 (2008), pp. 248–272], and the split Bregman iteration [T. Goldstein and S. Osher, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 2 (2009), pp. 323–343], as well as the augmented Lagrangian method [X.C. Tai and C. Wu, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 5567, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009, pp. 502–513]. In this paper, we first review the augmented Lagrangian method for the ROF model and then provide some convergence analysis and extensions to vectorial TV and high order models. All the algorithms and analysis will be presented in the discrete setting, which is much clearer for practical implementation than the continuous setting as in Tai and Wu, above. We also present, in the discrete setting, the connections between the augmented Lagrangian method, the dual methods, and the split Bregman iteration. Using our extensions and observations, we can easily figure out CGM and the split Bregman iteration for vectorial TV and high order models, which, to the best of our knowledge, have not been presented in the literature. Numerical examples demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of our method, especially in the image deblurring case.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/090767558

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Metadata

Authors
Wu, C., & Tai, X.-C.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences
Published
2010-01
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
300-339
ISSN
1936-4954 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020461703
Cited by
615
References
36
FWCI
37.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Augmented Lagrangian Method, Dual Methods, and Split Bregman Iteration for ROF, Vectorial TV, and High Order Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/090767558
The paper
Wu, C., & Tai, X.-C. (2010). Augmented Lagrangian Method, Dual Methods, and Split Bregman Iteration for ROF, Vectorial TV, and High Order Models. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1137/090767558

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.