The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of Parallel Methods for a $1024$-Processor Hypercube
Abstract
We have developed highly efficient parallel solutions for three practical, full-scale scientific problems: wave mechanics, fluid dynamics, and structural analysis. Several algorithmic techniques are used to keep communication and serial overhead small as both problem size and number of processors are varied. A new parameter, operation efficiency, is introduced that quantifies the tradeoff between communication and redundant computation. A 1024-processor MIMD ensemble is measured to be 502 to 637 times as fast as a single processor when problem size for the ensemble is fixed, and 1009 to 1020 times as fast as a single processor when problem size per processor is fixed. The latter measure, denoted scaled speedup, is developed and contrasted with the traditional measure of parallel speedup. The scaled-problem paradigm better reveals the capabilities of large ensembles, and permits detection of subtle hardware-induced load imbalances (such as error correction and data-dependent MFLOPS rates) that may become increasingly important as parallel processors increase in node count. Sustained performance for the applications is 70 to 130 MFLOPS, validating the massively parallel ensemble approach as a practical alternative to more conventional processing methods. The techniques presented appear extensible to even higher levels of parallelism than the 1024-processor level explored here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Validity of the single processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities
Amdahl, G. M. (1967) · Proceedings of the April 18-20, 1967, spring joint computer conference on - AFIPS '67 (Spring) · doi:10.1145/1465482.1465560 · Cited by 4,339
Metadata
- Authors
- Gustafson, J. L., Montry, G. R., & Benner, R. E.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 609-638
- ISSN
- 0196-5204 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-3417
- OpenAlex
- W2071649025
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 55.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of Parallel Methods for a $1024$-Processor Hypercube. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0909041
- The paper
- Gustafson, J. L., Montry, G. R., & Benner, R. E. (1988). Development of Parallel Methods for a $1024$-Processor Hypercube. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/0909041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.