Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 736

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Choosing the Forcing Terms in an Inexact Newton Method

Eisenstat, Stanley C., Walker, Homer F.·1996·SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing

Abstract

An inexact Newton method is a generalization of Newton’s method for solving $F(x) = 0,F:\mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^n $in which, at the kth iteration, the step $s_k $ from the current approximate solution $x_k $ is required to satisfy a condition $\|F(x_k ) + F'(x_k )s_k \| \leqslant \eta _k \|F(x_k )\|$ for a “forcing term” $\eta _k \in [0,1)$. In typical applications, the choice of the forcing terms is critical to the efficiency of the method and can affect robustness as well. Promising choices of the forcing terms are given, their local convergence properties are analyzed, and their practical performance is shown on a representative set of test problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/0917003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

  • PETSc/TAO Users Manual (Rev. 3.19)

    Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), A., Balay, S., USDOE Office of Science (SC), A. S. C. R. (., Abhyankar, S., Adams, M., Benson, S., Brown, J., Brune, P., Buschelman, K., Constantinescu, E., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2172/1968587 · Cited by 67

See all 736

Metadata

Authors
Eisenstat, S. C., & Walker, H. F.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
Published
1996-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
16-32
ISSN
  • 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7197
OpenAlex
W2048369486
Cited by
736
References
0
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Choosing the Forcing Terms in an Inexact Newton Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0917003
The paper
Eisenstat, S. C., & Walker, H. F. (1996). Choosing the Forcing Terms in an Inexact Newton Method. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/0917003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.