The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Choosing the Forcing Terms in an Inexact Newton Method
Abstract
An inexact Newton method is a generalization of Newton’s method for solving $F(x) = 0,F:\mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^n $in which, at the kth iteration, the step $s_k $ from the current approximate solution $x_k $ is required to satisfy a condition $\|F(x_k ) + F'(x_k )s_k \| \leqslant \eta _k \|F(x_k )\|$ for a “forcing term” $\eta _k \in [0,1)$. In typical applications, the choice of the forcing terms is critical to the efficiency of the method and can affect robustness as well. Promising choices of the forcing terms are given, their local convergence properties are analyzed, and their practical performance is shown on a representative set of test problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PETSc/TAO Users Manual (Rev. 3.19)
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), A., Balay, S., USDOE Office of Science (SC), A. S. C. R. (., Abhyankar, S., Adams, M., Benson, S., Brown, J., Brune, P., Buschelman, K., Constantinescu, E., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2172/1968587 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Eisenstat, S. C., & Walker, H. F.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-32
- ISSN
- 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2048369486
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Choosing the Forcing Terms in an Inexact Newton Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0917003
- The paper
- Eisenstat, S. C., & Walker, H. F. (1996). Choosing the Forcing Terms in an Inexact Newton Method. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/0917003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.