Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,014

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mathematical Models in Biology

Edelstein-Keshet, Leah·2005·Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks

Abstract

Life scientists are not always fully aware of the powerful role that mathematical models have in both answering biological research questions and in making predictions. Scientists have a clear view of the problem; they know the questions; they have identified ways to answer; and they produce the data to be analysed. Novel high throughput technologies are utilized that give rise to an unprecedented quantity of data. However, the data is ‘noisy’, and the answer to each question can be well hidden under terabytes of incomprehensible text files

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/1.9780898719147

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,014

Metadata

Authors
Edelstein-Keshet, L.
Venue
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks
Published
2005-01
OpenAlex
W1549251788
Cited by
2,014
References
0
FWCI
115.80
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mathematical Models in Biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/1.9780898719147
The paper
Edelstein-Keshet, L. (2005). Mathematical Models in Biology. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898719147

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.