The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods
Abstract
Preface Notation 1. Introduction. Linear Programming Primal-Dual Methods The Central Path A Primal-Dual Framework Path-Following Methods Potential-Reduction Methods Infeasible Starting Points Superlinear Convergence Extensions Mehrotra's Predictor-Corrector Algorithm Linear Algebra Issues Karmarkar's Algorithm 2. Background. Linear Programming and Interior-Point Methods Standard Form Optimality Conditions, Duality, and Solution Sets The B {SYMBOL 200 \f Symbol} N Partition and Strict Complementarity A Strictly Interior Point Rank of the Matrix A Bases and Vertices Farkas's Lemma and a Proof of the Goldman-Tucker Result The Central Path Background. Primal Method Primal-Dual Methods. Development of the Fundamental Ideas Notes and References 3. Complexity Theory. Polynomial Versus Exponential, Worst Case vs Average Case Storing the Problem Data. Dimension and Size The Turing Machine and Rational Arithmetic Primal-Dual Methods and Rational Arithmetic Linear Programming and Rational Numbers Moving to a Solution from an Interior Point Complexity of Simplex, Ellipsoid, and Interior-Point Methods Polynomial and Strongly Polynomial Algorithms Beyond the Turing Machine Model More on the Real-Number Model and Algebraic Complexity A General Complexity Theorem for Path-Following Methods Notes and References 4. Potential-Reduction Methods. A Primal-Dual Potential-Reduction Algorithm Reducing Forces Convergence A Quadratic Estimate of \Phi _{\rho } along a Feasible Direction Bounding the Coefficients in The Quadratic Approximation An Estimate of the Reduction in \Phi _{\rho } and Polynomial Complexity What About Centrality? Choosing {SYMBOL 114 \f Symbol} and {SYMBOL 97 \f Symbol} Notes and References 5. Path-Following Algorithms. The Short-Step Path-Following Algorithm Technical Results The Predictor-Corrector Method A Long-Step Path-Following Algorithm Limit Points of the Iteration Sequence Proof of Lemma 5.3 Notes and References 6. Infeasible-Interior-Point Algorithms. The Algorithm Convergence of Algorithm IPF Technical Results I. Bounds on \nu _k \delimiter 026B30D (x^k,s^k) \delimiter 026B30D Technical Results II. Bounds on (D^k)^{-1} \Delta x^k and D^k \Delta s^k Technical Results III. A Uniform Lower Bound on {SYMBOL 97 \f Symbol}k Proofs of Theorems 6.1 and 6.2 Limit Points of the Iteration Sequence 7. Superlinear Convergence and Finite Termination. Affine-Scaling Steps An Estimate of ({SYMBOL 68 \f Symbol}x, {SYMBOL 68 \f Symbol} s). The Feasible Case An Estimate of ({SYMBOL 68 \f Symbol} x, {SYMBOL 68 \f Symbol} s). The Infeasible Case Algorithm PC Is Superlinear Nearly Quadratic Methods Convergence of Algorithm LPF+ Convergence of the Iteration Sequence {SYMBOL 206 \f Symbol}(A,b,c) and Finite Termination A Finite Termination Strategy Recovering an Optimal Basis More on {SYMBOL 206 \f Symbol} (A,b,c) Notes and References 8. Extensions. The Monotone LCP Mixed and Horizontal LCP Strict Complementarity and LCP Convex QP Convex Programming Monotone Nonlinear Complementarity and Variational Inequalities Semidefinite Programming Proof of Theorem 8.4. Notes and References 9. Detecting Infeasibility. Self-Duality The Simplified HSD Form The HSDl Form Identifying a Solution-Free Region Implementations of the HSD Formulations Notes and References 10. Practical Aspects of Primal-Dual Algorithms. Motivation for Mehrotra's Algorithm The Algorithm Superquadratic Convergence Second-Order Trajectory-Following Methods Higher-Order Methods Further Enhancements Notes and References 11. Implementations. Three Forms of the Step Equation The Cholesky Factorization Sparse Cholesky Factorization. Minimum-Degree Orderings Other Orderings Small Pivots in the Cholesky Factorization Dense Columns in A The Augmented System Formulat
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Disciplined Convex Programming
Grant, M., Boyd, S., & Ye, Y. (2006) · Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications · doi:10.1007/0-387-30528-9_7 · Cited by 1,026
Andersen, E. D., & Andersen, K. D. (2000) · Applied Optimization · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3216-0_8 · Cited by 766
Interior Methods for Nonlinear Optimization
Forsgren, A., Gill, P. E., & Wright, M. H. (2002) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s0036144502414942 · Cited by 699
Reverse engineering gene networks using singular value decomposition and robust regression
Yeung, M. K. S., Tegnér, J., & Collins, J. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.092576199 · Cited by 667
An online active set strategy to overcome the limitations of explicit MPC
Ferreau, H. J., Bock, H. G., & Diehl, M. (2008) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.1251 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, S. J.
- Venue
- Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks
- Published
- 1997-01
- OpenAlex
- W1518039036
- Cited by
- 2,391
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.72
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/1.9781611971453
- The paper
- Wright, S. J. (1997). Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611971453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.