The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Co-Selection of Features and Instances for Unsupervised Rare Category Analysis
Abstract
Rare category analysis is of key importance both in theory and in practice. Previous research work focuses on supervised rare category analysis, such as rare category detection and rare category classification. In this paper, for the first time, we address the challenge of unsupervised rare category analysis, including feature selection and rare category selection. We propose to jointly deal with the two correlated tasks so that they can benefit from each other. To this end, we design an optimization framework which is able to co-select the relevant features and the examples from the rare category (a.k.a. the minority class). It is well justified theoretically. Furthermore, we develop the Partial Augmented Lagrangian Method (PALM) to solve the optimization problem. Experimental results on both synthetic and real data sets show the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By assuming strong similarities between rare instances, He & Carbonell [82] design an optimization framework to jointly select features and instances for anomaly detection on categorical data.”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [82]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, most reviewed pre-model XAD techniques are feature-based with the exception that He & Carbonell [82] also perform instance selection to improve interpretability.”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [82]
In the citing paper
“Assumes strong”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [82]
In the citing paper
“Jointly selects”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [82]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection
Li, Z., Zhu, Y., & Van Leeuwen, M. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3609333 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- He, J., & Carbonell, J.
- ORCID
- He, Jingrui
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2010 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining
- Published
- 2010-04-29
- Pages
- 525-536
- OpenAlex
- W2403790783
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Keywords
- unsupervised learning, feature selection, co-selection, optimization framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review