The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk Prediction with Electronic Health Records: A Deep Learning Approach
Abstract
The recent years have witnessed a surge of interests in data analytics with patient Electronic Health Records (EHR). Data-driven healthcare, which aims at effective utilization of big medical data, representing the collective learning in treating hundreds of millions of patients, to provide the best and most personalized care, is believed to be one of the most promising directions for transforming healthcare. EHR is one of the major carriers for make this data-driven healthcare revolution successful. There are many challenges on working directly with EHR, such as temporality, sparsity, noisiness, bias, etc. Thus effective feature extraction, or phenotyping from patient EHRs is a key step before any further applications. In this paper, we propose a deep learning approach for phenotyping from patient EHRs. We first represent the EHRs for every patient as a temporal matrix with time on one dimension and event on the other dimension. Then we build a four-layer convolutional neural network model for extracting phenotypes and perform prediction. The first layer is composed of those EHR matrices. The second layer is a one-side convolution layer that can extract phenotypes from the first layer. The third layer is a max pooling layer introducing sparsity on the detected phenotypes, so that only those significant phenotypes will remain. The fourth layer is a fully connected softmax prediction layer. In order to incorporate the temporal smoothness of the patient EHR, we also investigated three different temporal fusion mechanisms in the model: early fusion, late fusion and slow fusion. Finally the proposed model is validated on a real world EHR data warehouse under the specific scenario of predictive modeling of chronic diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care
Jensen, P. B., Jensen, L. J., & Brunak, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3208 · Cited by 1,680
Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records
Hripcsak, G., & Albers, D. J. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001145 · Cited by 795
Cited by
Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges
Miotto, R., Wang, F., Wang, S., Jiang, X., & Dudley, J. T. (2018) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx044 · Cited by 3,076
Self-citationShickel, B., Tighe, P. J., Bihorac, A., & Rashidi, P. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2017.2767063 · Cited by 1,688
A clinically applicable approach to continuous prediction of future acute kidney injury
Tomašev, N., Glorot, X., Rae, J. W., Zielinski, M., Askham, H., Saraiva, A., Mottram, A., Meyer, C., Ravuri, S., Protsyuk, I., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1390-1 · Cited by 1,086
Predicting healthcare trajectories from medical records: a deep learning approach
Pham, T., Tran, T., Phung, D., & Venkatesh, S. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2017.04.001 · Cited by 447
AI in Health: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Directions
Wang, F., & Preininger, A. (2019) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1677908 · Cited by 398
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, P., & Hu, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2016 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining
- Published
- 2016-06-30
- Pages
- 432-440
- OpenAlex
- W2511950764
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.60
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Prediction with Electronic Health Records: A Deep Learning Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/1.9781611974348.49
- The paper
- Cheng, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, P., & Hu, J. (2016). Risk Prediction with Electronic Health Records: A Deep Learning Approach. Proceedings of the 2016 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974348.49
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.