The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New and Improved Johnson–Lindenstrauss Embeddings via the Restricted Isometry Property
Open accessAbstract
Consider an $m \times N$ matrix $\Phi$ with the restricted isometry property of order k and level $\delta$; that is, the norm of any k-sparse vector in $\mathbb{R}^N$ is preserved to within a multiplicative factor of $1 \pm \delta$ under application of $\Phi$. We show that by randomizing the column signs of such a matrix $\Phi$, the resulting map with high probability embeds any fixed set of $p = O(e^k)$ points in $\mathbb{R}^N$ into $\mathbb{R}^m$ without distorting the norm of any point in the set by more than a factor of $1 \pm 4 \delta$. Consequently, matrices with the restricted isometry property and with randomized column signs provide optimal Johnson–Lindenstrauss embeddings up to logarithmic factors in N. In particular, our results improve the best known bounds on the necessary embedding dimension m for a wide class of structured random matrices; for partial Fourier and partial Hadamard matrices, we improve the recent bound $m \gtrsim \delta^{-4} \log(p) \log^4(N)$ given by Ailon and Liberty to $m \gtrsim \delta^{-2} \log(p) \log^4(N)$, which is optimal up to the logarithmic factors in N. Our results also have a direct application in the area of compressed sensing for redundant dictionaries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Candes, E. J., Romberg, J., & Tao, T. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2005.862083 · Cited by 15,639
Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements
Candès, E. J., Romberg, J. K., & Tao, T. (2006) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.20124 · Cited by 7,036
Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies?
Candes, E. J., & Tao, T. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.885507 · Cited by 6,839
Probability Inequalities for sums of Bounded Random Variables
Hoeffding, W. (1994) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0865-5_26 · Cited by 6,666
Halko, N., Martinsson, P. G., & Tropp, J. A. (2011) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/090771806 · Cited by 4,002
Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert space
Johnson, W. B., & Lindenstrauss, J. (1984) · Contemporary Mathematics · doi:10.1090/conm/026/737400 · Cited by 2,523
Donoho, D. L. (2006) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.20132 · Cited by 2,490
A Simple Proof of the Restricted Isometry Property for Random Matrices
Baraniuk, R., Davenport, M., DeVore, R., & Wakin, M. (2008) · Constructive Approximation · doi:10.1007/s00365-007-9003-x · Cited by 2,372
Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random Variables
Hoeffding, W. (1963) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2282952 · Cited by 1,166
Beyond Nyquist: Efficient Sampling of Sparse Bandlimited Signals
Tropp, J. A., Laska, J. N., Duarte, M. F., Romberg, J. K., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2034811 · Cited by 1,089
Metadata
- Authors
- Krahmer, F., & Ward, R.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1269-1281
- ISSN
- 0036-1410 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7154
- OpenAlex
- W1566187773
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 29.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New and Improved Johnson–Lindenstrauss Embeddings via the Restricted Isometry Property. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/100810447
- The paper
- Krahmer, F., & Ward, R. (2011). New and Improved Johnson–Lindenstrauss Embeddings via the Restricted Isometry Property. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1137/100810447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.