Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,429

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws

Harten, Amiram, Lax, Peter D., Leer, Bram van·1983·SIAM Review

Abstract

This paper reviews some of the recent developments in upstream difference schemes through a unified representation, in order to enable comparison between the various schemes. Special attention is given to the Godunov-type schemes that result from using an approximate solution of the Riemann problem. For schemes based on flux splitting, the approximate Riemann solution can be interpreted as a solution of the collisionless Boltzmann equation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/1025002

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 3,429

Metadata

Authors
Harten, A., Lax, P. D., & Leer, B. V.
Venue
SIAM Review
Published
1983-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
35-61
ISSN
  • 0036-1445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7200
OpenAlex
W2043057066
Cited by
3,429
References
9
FWCI
22.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/1025002
The paper
Harten, A., Lax, P. D., & Leer, B. V. (1983). On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. SIAM Review. https://doi.org/10.1137/1025002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.