The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixture Densities, Maximum Likelihood and the EM Algorithm
Abstract
The problem of estimating the parameters which determine a mixture density has been the subject of a large, diverse body of literature spanning nearly ninety years. During the last two decades, the method of maximum likelihood has become the most widely followed approach to this problem, thanks primarily to the advent of high speed electronic computers. Here, we first offer a brief survey of the literature directed toward this problem and review maximum-likelihood estimation for it. We then turn to the subject of ultimate interest, which is a particular iterative procedure for numerically approximating maximum-likelihood estimates for mixture density problems. This procedure, known as the EM algorithm, is a specialization to the mixture density context of a general algorithm of the same name used to approximate maximum-likelihood estimates for incomplete data problems. We discuss the formulation and theoretical and practical properties of the EM algorithm for mixture densities, focussing in particular on mixtures of densities from exponential families.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation of a mixing distribution
Laird, N. (1978) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1978.10480103 · Cited by 753
Cited by
Maximum a posteriori estimation for multivariate Gaussian mixture observations of Markov chains
Gauvain, J.-L., & Lee, C.-H. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · doi:10.1109/89.279278 · Cited by 2,108
Wavelet-based statistical signal processing using hidden Markov models
Crouse, M. S., Nowak, R. D., & Baraniuk, R. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.668544 · Cited by 1,643
Statistical Color Models with Application to Skin Detection
Jones, M. J., & Rehg, J. M. (2002) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1013200319198 · Cited by 1,542
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Latent Interaction Effects with the LMS Method
Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296338 · Cited by 1,429
The EM Algorithm—an Old Folk-song Sung to a Fast New Tune
Meng, X.-L., & Van Dyk, D. (1997) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00082 · Cited by 802
Metadata
- Authors
- Redner, R. A., & Walker, H. F.
- Venue
- SIAM Review
- Published
- 1984-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-239
- ISSN
- 0036-1445 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7200
- OpenAlex
- W1981367467
- Cited by
- 2,693
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixture Densities, Maximum Likelihood and the EM Algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/1026034
- The paper
- Redner, R. A., & Walker, H. F. (1984). Mixture Densities, Maximum Likelihood and the EM Algorithm. SIAM Review. https://doi.org/10.1137/1026034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.