Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 494

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mathematical Models for Hysteresis

Macki, Jack W., Nistri, Paolo, Zecca, Pietro·1993·SIAM Review

Abstract

The various existing classical models for hysteresis, Preisach, Ishlinskii, Duhem–Madelung, are surveyed, as well a more modern treatments by contemporary workers. The emphasis is on a clear mathematical description of the formulation and properties of each model. In addition the authors try to make the reader aware of the many open questions in the study of hysteresis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/1035005

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 494

Metadata

Authors
Macki, J. W., Nistri, P., & Zecca, P.
Venue
SIAM Review
Published
1993-03
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
94-123
ISSN
  • 0036-1445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7200
OpenAlex
W2017941395
Cited by
494
References
15
FWCI
18.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mathematical Models for Hysteresis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/1035005
The paper
Macki, J. W., Nistri, P., & Zecca, P. (1993). Mathematical Models for Hysteresis. SIAM Review. https://doi.org/10.1137/1035005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.