The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using Linear Algebra for Intelligent Information Retrieval
Abstract
Currently, most approaches to retrieving textual materials from scientific databases depend on a lexical match between words in users’ requests and those in or assigned to documents in a database. Because of the tremendous diversity in the words people use to describe the same document, lexical methods are necessarily incomplete and imprecise. Using the singular value decomposition (SVD), one can take advantage of the implicit higher-order structure in the association of terms with documents by determining the SVD of large sparse term by document matrices. Terms and documents represented by 200–300 of the largest singular vectors are then matched against user queries. We call this retrieval method latent semantic indexing (LSI) because the subspace represents important associative relationships between terms and documents that are not evident in individual documents. LSI is a completely automatic yet intelligent indexing method, widely applicable, and a promising way to improve users’ access to many kinds of textual materials, or to documents and services for which textual descriptions are available. A survey of the computational requirements for managing LSI-encoded databases as well as current and future applications of LSI is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
An introduction to latent semantic analysis
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539809545028 · Cited by 4,880
Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition
Louwerse, M. M. (2011) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x · Cited by 399
Self-Adapting Linear Algebra Algorithms and Software
Demmel, J., Dongarra, J., Eijkhout, V., Fuentes, E., Petitet, A., Vuduc, R., Whaley, R. C., & Yelick, K. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2004.840848 · Cited by 204
The debate on automated essay grading
Hearst, M. A. (2000) · IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications · doi:10.1109/5254.889104 · Cited by 176
Language models are an effective representation learning technique for electronic health record data
Steinberg, E., Jung, K., Fries, J. A., Corbin, C. K., Pfohl, S. R., & Shah, N. H. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103637 · Cited by 132
Multilayer SOM With Tree-Structured Data for Efficient Document Retrieval and Plagiarism Detection
Chow, T. W. S., & Rahman, M. K. M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2009.2023394 · Cited by 67
Analysis of TF-IDF Model and its Variant for Document Retrieval
Mishra, A., & Vishwakarma, S. (2015) · 2015 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) · doi:10.1109/cicn.2015.157 · Cited by 65
Quality indices for topic model selection and evaluation: a literature review and case study
Meaney, C., Stukel, T. A., Austin, P. C., Moineddin, R., Greiver, M., & Escobar, M. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02216-1 · Cited by 23
LSISOM — A Latent Semantic Indexing Approach to Self-Organizing Maps of Document Collections
Ampazis, N., & Perantonis, S. J. (2004) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1023/b:nepl.0000023449.95030.8f · Cited by 18
Rahman, M. K. M., & Chow, T. W. S. (2010) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.002 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Berry, M. W., Dumais, S. T., & O’Brien, G. W.
- Venue
- SIAM Review
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 573-595
- ISSN
- 0036-1445 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7200
- OpenAlex
- W2072773380
- Cited by
- 1,481
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.