The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Stochastic Newton MCMC Method for Large-Scale Statistical Inverse Problems with Application to Seismic Inversion
Abstract
We address the solution of large-scale statistical inverse problems in the framework of Bayesian inference. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method is the most popular approach for sampling the posterior probability distribution that describes the solution of the statistical inverse problem. MCMC methods face two central difficulties when applied to large-scale inverse problems: first, the forward models (typically in the form of partial differential equations) that map uncertain parameters to observable quantities make the evaluation of the probability density at any point in parameter space very expensive; and second, the high-dimensional parameter spaces that arise upon discretization of infinite-dimensional parameter fields make the exploration of the probability density function prohibitive. The challenge for MCMC methods is to construct proposal functions that simultaneously provide a good approximation of the target density while being inexpensive to manipulate. Here we present a so-called Stochastic Newton method in which MCMC is accelerated by constructing and sampling from a proposal density that builds a local Gaussian approximation based on local gradient and Hessian (of the log posterior) information. Thus, the method exploits tools (adjoint-based gradients and Hessians) that have been instrumental for fast (often mesh-independent) solution of deterministic inverse problems. Hessian manipulations (inverse, square root) are made tractable by a low-rank approximation that exploits the compact nature of the data misfit operator. This is analogous to a reduced model of the parameter-to-observable map. The method is applied to the Bayesian solution of an inverse medium problem governed by 1D seismic wave propagation. We compare the Stochastic Newton method with a reference black box MCMC method as well as a gradient-based Langevin MCMC method, and observe at least two orders of magnitude improvement in convergence for problems with up to 65 parameters. Numerical evidence suggests that a 1025 parameter problem converges at the same rate as the 65 parameter problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787 · Cited by 6,045
Bayesian calibration of computer models
Kennedy, M. C., & O'Hagan, A. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00294 · Cited by 4,222
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, J., Wilcox, L. C., Burstedde, C., & Ghattas, O.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- A1460-A1487
- ISSN
- 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2082261407
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Stochastic Newton MCMC Method for Large-Scale Statistical Inverse Problems with Application to Seismic Inversion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/110845598
- The paper
- Martin, J., Wilcox, L. C., Burstedde, C., & Ghattas, O. (2012). A Stochastic Newton MCMC Method for Large-Scale Statistical Inverse Problems with Application to Seismic Inversion. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/110845598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.